On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods

By Mari Pöyhönen, Raimo P. Hämäläinen. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001

345 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9aa335c6afa1b979a4cd6ffce78d2621827388b5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Social distance and reciprocity: An Internet experiment (2007, neutral): “Examples include an investigation of multiattribute weighting (Poyhonen and Hamalainen 2001), the effect of search costs on price-competition on the Web (Lynch and Ariely 2001), and tolerance for waiting on the Internet (Dellaert and Kahn 1999).”
The benefits of global scaling in multi-criteria decision analysis (2009, background): “ Poyhonen and Hamalainen (2001) compared several multiattribute weighting techniques but could not determine a clear winner.”
A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning (2009, background): “7 See Shoemaker and Waid (1982), Beinat (1997), Hajkowicz et al. (2000b) and Pöyhönen and Hämäläinen (2001) for comparisons of weighting techniques. relative attractiveness of different kinds and levels of environmental impact were established along with the scale for each objective using numerical…”
An evaluation of multi-criteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy (2001, methodology): “Previous experiments have compared various weighting methods (e.g., Belton, 1986; Hobbs et al., 1992; P .oyh .onen and H.am.al.ainen, 2001).”
Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management (2014, background): “9 Classification of Weighting Methods In literature, different weighting methods have been proposed to assign weights to the criteria (Pöyhönen and Hämäläinen 2001; Stewart 1992).”
A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process (2012, methodology): “The research of Pöyhönen and Hämäläinen [18] showed that in DIRECT, SWING, and TRADE-OFF methods, weights do not differ from each other.”
A comprehensive VIKOR method for material selection (2011, methodology): “In suggested model, the subjective weights can be extracted by direct weighting procedures [34,35] (e.”