Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management

By Noorul Hassan Zardari, K. Ahmed, Prof. Dr. SM Shirazi, CEng, Z. Yusop. 2014

384 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Ocean Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fa273443f5d667172414b80fd0506b394faebcf8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
2. Zenonas Turskis
3. Jurgita Antucheviciene
4. Jaroslaw Watrobski
5. Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee
6. Maghsoud Amiri
7. Andrii Shekhovtsov
8. Fatih Tüysüz

In Ocean Engineering

1. Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
2. Andrii Shekhovtsov
3. Fatih Tüysüz
4. Wojciech Sałabun
5. Jaroslaw Watrobski
6. Zenonas Turskis
7. Yakup Çelikbilek

Citations in the corpus

• Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods (2020, methodology): “According to [33], the entropy method is based on a measure of uncertainty in the information.”
• Determination of Objective Weights Using a New Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC) (2021, methodology): “The criteria with more variations have greater weights [20].”
• An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis (2020, methodology): “There are various developed MCDM methods with different characteristics and also different classi fi cations of these methods in the literature, which can be found in Zardari, Ahmed, Shirazi, and Yusop (2015).”