Effects of Goal Framing and Emotions on Perceived Threat and Willingness to Sacrifice for Climate Change

By Helena Bilandzic, Anja Kalch, J. Soentgen. 2017

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a55ca0db9febfe95b2dbc6a65793addc33073e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Robin L. Nabi
2. K. Winterich
3. Gergana Y. Nenkov
4. Abel Gustafson

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. K. Winterich
2. Abel Gustafson

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Abel Gustafson
2. R. Jensen
3. Gabriel E. Gonzales
4. Robin L. Nabi
5. K. Winterich
6. Gergana Y. Nenkov
7. Alice E. Hall
8. L. Aarøe

Citations in the corpus

• Framing Climate Change: Exploring the Role of Emotion in Generating Advocacy Behavior (2018, background): “…the path between gain and loss framing manipulations and their subsequent effects on the willingness to sacrifice for the climate change cause (Bilandzic, Kalch, & Soentgen, 2017), such that loss frames around climate change protection increased willingness by way of increased fear and guilt,…”
• Knowing What It Makes: How Product Transformation Salience Increases Recycling (2019, background): “Other research has also examined the effects of loss- versus gain-framed appeals on environmental attitudes and behaviors (Bilandzic, Kalch, and Soentgen 2017; Spence and Pidgeon 2010; White, MacDonnell, and Dahl 2011).”