A Structural Perspective on the Experimentalist School
By Michael P. Keane. 2010
103 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Marketing
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Imran Rasul
- John A. List
- Jayson L. Lusk
- Thomas Brown
- S. B. Olsen
- J. Ladenburg
- Jackson Loomis
- F. Norwood
In General Decision Sciences
- Imran Rasul
- John A. List
- Daniel John Zizzo
- Jayson L. Lusk
- Fredrik Carlsson
- Daniel Kahneman
- J. Ladenburg
- Thomas Brown
In Marketing
- Imran Rasul
- John A. List
- Jackson Loomis
- Jayson L. Lusk
- James J. Murphy
- Thomas Stevens
- J. Ladenburg
- S. B. Olsen
Citations in the corpus
- Field experiments in labor economics (2010, methodology): “As Keane (2010) points out, this type of approach has similar drawbacks associated with the simple regression framework in the Coleman report.”
- Invited Paper - Learning Models: An Assessment of Progress, Challenges, and New Developments (2011, unknown): “The natural experiment school of econometrics views clinical trials as the gold standard to which economics should aspire to avoid structural modeling – see Keane (2010a).”
- TRYGVE HAAVELMO AND THE EMERGENCE OF CAUSAL CALCULUS (2014, unknown): “A more reasonable alternative, one that I have advocated in (Pearl, 2000) and that is gaining support among economists (e.g., Heckman, 2000, 2003, 2008; Keane, 2010; Leamer, 2010) is to treat an economic model as an oracle for all causally related queries, including questions of prospective and intr”