The Matching of Motivations to Affordances in the Volunteer Environment

By Arthur A. Stukas, Keilah A. Worth, E. Clary, Mark Snyder. 2009

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98c1701e3cf5aa2447ca876cd78c1ad781187a1a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. S. Studer
2. R. Hoye
3. K. Brown
4. Matthew Nicholson
5. Arthur A. Stukas

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Studer
2. L. Aisbett
3. R. Hoye
4. K. Brown
5. Matthew Nicholson
6. Arthur A. Stukas

Citations in the corpus

• Motivations to Volunteer and Their Associations With Volunteers’ Well-Being (2016, methodology): “Instead, the VFI motivations to volunteer may be better predictors of successful outcomes from volunteering, particularly if task affordances and functionally relevant benefits can be ensured (e.g., Clary et al., 1998; Stukas et al., 2009).4 128 Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 45(1)”
• Volunteer Management (2016, background): “Quantitative studies which query volunteers provide information on whether, for example, the match with motivational dispositions (Stukas et al., 2009), organizational care variables (Rice & Fallon, 2011), socialization (Hidalgo & Moreno, 2009; Jordan & Fiene, 2012), or perceived respect (Boezeman &”