USING THE LABORATORY TO ENHANCE STUDENT LEARNING

By Michael P. Clough, In Bybee. 2002

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98970e980eabf24991304733611d5e4cd4c58317

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. James R. Brinson
2. Jeffrey V. Nickerson
3. Jing Ma

Citations in the corpus

• Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional (hands-on) laboratories: A review of the empirical research (2015, background): “…their presumed strong impact on student learning outcomes and performance and on their presumed practicality of professional preparation (Basey, Sackett, & Robinsons, 2008; Clough, 2002; Finn, Maxwell, & Calver, 2002; Magin, Churches, & Reizes, 1986; Nersessian, 1991; Ottander & Grelsson, 2006).”
• Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review (2006, background): “Hands-On Laboratory Article Cross-Reference HL-No 1 Grant [1995] 2 Collins [1986] 3 Fisher [1977] 4 Faucher [1985] 5 Edward [2002] 6 Magin and Kanapathipillai [2000] 7 Magin [1984] 8 Elton [1983] 9 Berg et al.”