A general typology of research designs featuring mixed methods.

By C. Teddlie, A. Tashakkori. 2006

704 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/984acce3d901d695d99e7269f2a880ac5874ac0d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Validity Issue in Mixed Research (2006, methodology): “Conversion mixed designs involve data transformation wherein one data form is converted into the other and then subsequently analyzed (Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2006).”
Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research (2007, methodology): “Currently, several typologies are available including, for example, Creswell and Plano Clark (2007), Morgan (1998), and Teddlie and Tashakkori (2006).”
Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs (2015, methodology): “In mixed methods, research designs serve as conceptual frameworks for organizing, conducting, and communicating the qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis and the integration of the two strands (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011; Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2006).”
Guidelines for Conducting Mixed-methods Research: An Extension and Illustration (2016, methodology): “(b) Sequential mixed designs are “designs in which there are at least two strands that occur chronologically” (Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2006, p. 21).”
Editorial: Differing Perspectives on Mixed Methods Research (2007, unknown): “This view has been labeled as ‘‘quasimixed’’ by Teddlie and Tashakkori (2006).”
Validity argument for assessing L2 pragmatics in interaction using mixed methods (2015, methodology): “…approach to validity arguments, the present study aims to obtain appropriate backing for the evaluation inference using sequential mixed methods (Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2006), focusing on three underlying assumptions (appropriate assessment task design, sound rating criteria, and rater…”
What factors influence knowledge sharing in organizations? A social dilemma perspective of social media communication (2016, methodology): “The research model presented in Figure 1, as output of the literature review (described in section 2), has been tested with a concurrent design in a mixed method tradition (Teddlie and Tashakkori 2006, Creswell et al. 2003).”
The Value of Mixed Methods Designs to Social Justice Research in Counseling and Psychology (2013, background): “Finally, some limitations of mixed methods designs are highlighted.”
Raising language awareness in peer interaction: a cross-context, cross-methodology examination (2012, background): “Amid the never-ending paradigm war (Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2006), what we have demonstrated is that both methodologies contribute to our knowledge in different manners.”
Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods (2007, background): “The latter identifies studies in which a serious integration of the findings/inferences does not occur (see Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2006).”
Mixed methods research synthesis: definition, framework, and potential (2011, unknown): “The motives behind the articulation of these typologies are diverse, and include (1) presenting a flexible organizational structure for mixed methods research, (2) developing conceptual frameworks that inform and guide the practice of mixed methods inquiry, (3) offering credibility to the mixed meth”