The All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS) Data Sets
By Michael Davis, P. Guhathakurta, N. Konidaris, J. Newman, M. Ashby, A. Biggs, Pauline Barmby, K. Bundy, S. Chapman, A. Coil and 46 more. 2006
466 citations recorded by the source corpus.
In this the first of a series of Letters, we present a panchromatic data set in the Extended Groth Strip region of the sky. Our survey, the All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS), aims to study the physical properties and evolutionary processes of galaxies at z ~ 1. It includes the following deep, wide-field imaging data sets: Chandra/ACIS X-ray, GALEX ultraviolet, CFHT/MegaCam Legacy Survey optical, CFHT/CFH12K optical, Hubble Space Telescope/ACS optical and NICMOS near-infrared, Palomar/WIRC near-infrared, Spitzer/IRAC mid-infrared, Spitzer/MIPS far-infrared, and VLA radio continuum. In addition, this region of the sky has been targeted for extensive spectroscopy using the Deep Imaging Multi-Object Spectrograph (DEIMOS) on the Keck II 10 m telescope. Our survey is compared to other large multiwavelength surveys in terms of depth and sky coverage.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97d93b4cc2420b87d10a10a3c5cf4980ef54304b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
- P. Hopkins
- L. Hernquist
- C. Conroy
- R. Dav'e
- R. Somerville
- P. V. van Dokkum
- A. Dekel
- Christopher J. Conselice
In Instrumentation
- P. Hopkins
- L. Hernquist
- C. Conroy
- P. V. van Dokkum
- R. Dav'e
- R. Somerville
- Christopher J. Conselice
- M. Franx
Citations in the corpus
- AEGIS-X: THE CHANDRA DEEP SURVEY OF THE EXTENDED GROTH STRIP (2008, methodology): “Optical identifications There is extensive optical photometric coverage of the AEGIS field from a number of telescopes, including SDSS, KPNO, Subaru and MMT (further details can be found in Davis et al. 2007).”
- The Redshift Evolution of Wet, Dry, and Mixed Galaxy Mergers from Close Galaxy Pairs in the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey (2008, methodology): “The DEEP2 Redshift Survey has been made possible through the dedicated efforts of the DEIMOS instrument team at UC Santa Cruz and support of the staff at Keck Observatory.”
- DEMOGRAPHICS AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF GAS OUTFLOWS/INFLOWS AT 0.4 < z < 1.4 (2012, background): “We are grateful to the DEEP2 and AEGIS teams for providing both the galaxy sample and ancillary data on galaxy properties.”
- The mean star formation rate of X-ray selected active galaxies and its evolution from z~2.5: results from PEP-Herschel (2012, background): “At higher redshifts, multi-wavelength surveys such as GOODS (Dickinson et al. 2003), COSMOS (Scoville et al. 2007) and AEGIS (Davis et al. 2007) played a major role.”
- 3D-HST WFC3-SELECTED PHOTOMETRIC CATALOGS IN THE FIVE CANDELS/3D-HST FIELDS: PHOTOMETRY, PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFTS, AND STELLAR MASSES (2014, methodology): “8.6 (Bertin & Arnouts 1996) on the following publicly available images: AEGIS, ACS-F814W (Davis et al. 2007); COSMOS, WFC3-F160W (v1.”
- THE GROWTH OF MASSIVE GALAXIES SINCE z = 2 (2009, methodology): “The survey targeted two 28′×28′ fields: a subsection of the COSMOS field (Scoville et al. 2007), and a field containing part of the AEGIS strip (Davis et al. 2007).”
- The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and Survey Design (2017, unknown): “These included the GAMA, AEGIS, VVDS, VIPERS and DEEP2-3 regions, where extensive spectroscopic data are available, and the COSMOS field, where accurate 30-band photometric redshifts are also available.”
- Photometric redshifts for the CFHTLS T0004 deep and wide fields (2008, methodology): “It includes theDEEP2 redshift survey (Davis et al. 2003 and Davis et al. 2007), the newVVDS “wide” sample (Garilli et al. 2008) and the “zCOSMOS” sample (Lilly et al. 2007).”
- The Sydney-AAO Multi-object Integral field spectrograph (2011, background): “The major spectroscopic surveys to date have used a single fibre (Colless et al. 2001; Abazajian et al. 2003) or single slit (Le Fèvre et al. 2005; Davis et al. 2007) on each object, and so obtain just one measurement of these parameters for each galaxy.”
- 3D-HST: A WIDE-FIELD GRISM SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY WITH THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE (2012, unknown): “The adopted WCS reference images are the following HST-based public image mosaics: AEGIS, ACS-i814 (Davis et al. 2007); COSMOS, ACS-i814 (Koekemoer et al. 2007); GOODS-N, ACS-z850 (Giavalisco et al. 2004); GOODS-South, ACS-z850 (Giavalisco et al. 2004); HUDF09, WFC3-H160 (Bouwens et al. 2010); and…”
- TYPE Ia SUPERNOVA RATE MEASUREMENTS TO REDSHIFT 2.5 FROM CANDELS: SEARCHING FOR PROMPT EXPLOSIONS IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE (2014, methodology): “…et al. 2007; Koekemoer et al. 2007); UDS: the UKIDSS Ultra Deep Survey (Lawrence et al. 2007; Cirasuolo et al. 2007); EGS: the Extended Groth Strip (Davis et al. 2007) In the calibration stage, RAW images from HST are processed into FLT images using the STSDAS calibration tools provided by the…”
- The DEEP3 Galaxy Redshift Survey: the impact of environment on the size evolution of massive early-type galaxies at intermediate redshift (2011, methodology): “1; Davis et al. 2007; Lotz et al. 2008).”
- The first-year shear catalog of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program Survey (2017, background): “The major datasets that offer unique synergy with HSC data are the arc-minute-resolution, high-sensitivity CMB survey by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT; Swetz et al. 2011) in Chile, and its polarization extension ACTPol (Thornton et al. 2016); X-ray data from XMM-XXL (Pierre et al. 2016) and e”
- STELLAR MASSES FROM THE CANDELS SURVEY: THE GOODS-SOUTH AND UDS FIELDS (2014, methodology): “For detailed descriptions of the reduction pipeline, redshift measurement code, and quality assignment process refer to Wirth et al. (2004), Davis et al. (2007), and Newman et al. (2013).”
- CARS: the CFHTLS-Archive-Research Survey - II. Weighing dark matter halos of Lyman-break galaxies at z = 3–5 (2009, methodology): “With thousands of public spectroscopic redshifts from the VIMOS VLT Deep Survey (VVDS) on the D1 field (Le Fèvre et al. 2005), the zCOSMOS survey on the D2 field (Lilly et al. 2007), and the DEEP2 survey on the D3 field (Davis et al. 2007), we test the performance of our photo-z’s.”
- ASTROMETRY.NET: BLIND ASTROMETRIC CALIBRATION OF ARBITRARY ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES (2009, methodology): “We chose the All-wavelength Extended Groth strip International Survey (AEGIS; Davis et al. 2007) footprint because it has many HST exposures and is within the SDSS footprint.”
- THE DEEP2 GALAXY REDSHIFT SURVEY: DESIGN, OBSERVATIONS, DATA REDUCTION, AND REDSHIFTS (2012, background): “It has one of only two large twocolor HST ACS mosaics (Davis et al. 2007, Lotz et al. 2008), the other being GEMS in ECDFS (Rix et al. 2004).”