ASTROMETRY.NET: BLIND ASTROMETRIC CALIBRATION OF ARBITRARY ASTRONOMICAL IMAGES

By Dustin Lang, David W. Hogg, Keir Mierle, M. Blanton, Sam T. Roweis. 2009

932 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We have built a reliable and robust system that takes as input an astronomical image, and returns as output the pointing, scale, and orientation of that image (the astrometric calibration or World Coordinate System information). The system requires no first guess, and works with the information in the image pixels alone; that is, the problem is a generalization of the “lost in space” problem in which nothing—not even the image scale—is known. After robust source detection is performed in the input image, asterisms (sets of four or five stars) are geometrically hashed and compared to pre-indexed hashes to generate hypotheses about the astrometric calibration. A hypothesis is only accepted as true if it passes a Bayesian decision theory test against a null hypothesis. With indices built from the USNO-B catalog and designed for uniformity of coverage and redundancy, the success rate is >99.9% for contemporary near-ultraviolet and visual imaging survey data, with no false positives. The failure rate is consistent with the incompleteness of the USNO-B catalog; augmentation with indices built from the Two Micron All Sky Survey catalog brings the completeness to 100% with no false positives. We are using this system to generate consistent and standards-compliant meta-data for digital and digitized imaging from plate repositories, automated observatories, individual scientific investigators, and hobbyists. This is the first step in a program of making it possible to trust calibration meta-data for astronomical data of arbitrary provenance.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Computational Mechanics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9fde11ea9cc41db74b698cd42d11f12a43d2d093

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. C. Kochanek
  2. S. Smartt
  3. Krzysztof Zbigniew Stanek
  4. T. Thompson
  5. Y. Zu
  6. P. Hopkins
  7. J. Prieto
  8. Nozomu Tominaga

In Computational Mechanics

  1. H. Weiland
  2. H. Flewelling
  3. S. Smartt
  4. T. Thompson
  5. Christian Wolf
  6. Larry Denneau
  7. Rachel Mandelbaum
  8. C. Kochanek

Citations in the corpus