Action control by implementation intentions : effective cue detection and efficient response initiation

By E. Parks‐Stamm, Peter M. Gollwitzer, G. Oettingen. 2007

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/97d6f72443690fb8e90a55f7dcca8c967a400543

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Peter M. Gollwitzer
2. G. Oettingen
3. P. Sheeran
4. Anja Achtziger
5. Ute C. Bayer
6. Thomas Llewelyn Webb
7. E. Parks‐Stamm
8. E. Miles

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Peter M. Gollwitzer
2. Thomas Llewelyn Webb
3. P. Sheeran
4. G. Oettingen
5. Anja Achtziger
6. Ute C. Bayer
7. E. Parks‐Stamm
8. Georg Odenthal

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Peter M. Gollwitzer
2. G. Oettingen
3. Anja Achtziger
4. Ute C. Bayer
5. P. Sheeran
6. Thomas Llewelyn Webb
7. E. Parks‐Stamm
8. F. Wieber

Citations in the corpus

• Effective regulation of affect: An action control perspective on emotion regulation (2012, background): “Parks-Stamm et al. (2007) demonstrated, for example, that implementation intentions could achieve their effects by one or other mechanism (or both).”
• Staying on track: Planned goal striving is protected from disruptive internal states (2010, background): “Thus the critical cue is more easily detected, readily attended to, and successfully remembered (e.g., Aarts, Dijksterhuis, & Midden, 1999; Parks-Stamm, Gollwitzer, & Oettingen, 2007; Webb & Sheeran, 2004, 2006).”
• Willingness to communicate and action control (2010, background): “In considering how to deal with tendencies toward hesitation among language learners, both language teachers and future researchers might wish to draw on the work of Parks-Stamm et al. (2007) on implementation intentions, as applied to WTC.”
• Implementation intentions and test anxiety: Shielding academic performance from distraction (2010, background): “Implementation intentions are proposed to aid goal striving by increasing the accessibility of the situational cue specified in the ifcomponent and by automating the response specified in the thencomponent (Gollwitzer, 1999; Parks-Stamm, Gollwitzer, & Oettingen, 2007 ).”
• Self-efficacy Feelings Moderate Implementation Intention Effects (2010, background): “However, if-components also need be specific enough to avoid deliberation of whether one should act or not in the face of the specified cue (Parks-Stamm, Gollwitzer, & Oettingen, 2007 ; Wieber & Sassenberg, 2006 ).”
• Planning promotes goal striving. (2011, background): “In a study by Parks-Stamm, Gollwitzer, and Oettingen (2007), participants had to identify five-letter words in a recorded story that was quickly read aloud.”
• Self-regulation of consumer decision making and behavior: The role of implementation intentions (2009, unknown): “This heightened accessibility of the if-part of the plan has been observed in several studies (e.g., Aarts, Dijksterhuis, & Midden, 1999; Parks-Stamm, Gollwitzer, & Oettingen, 2007; Webb & Sheeran, 2007, 2008).”
• Weakness of the will: Is a quick fix possible? (2014, background): “Past research in our lab also showed that the specified situational cues have an advantage to be seized (their mental representations become highly activated and the mental representations of competing situational cues become deactivated; Parks-Stamm et al. 2007).”