Applications, grants and the value of patent

By Dominique Guellec, Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. 2000

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9778aa38c6a3b335df9b2affd3e908a81ee7cd1c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. I. Haščič
2. N. Johnstone
3. Xingneng Xia
4. Marion Hemar
5. Christian Michel
6. Dan-Ni Zhang
7. J. Poirier
8. Yingyuan Guo

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. N. Johnstone
2. M. Reitzig
3. I. Haščič
4. Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli
5. Antonio Capaldo

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. M. Reitzig

Citations in the corpus

• Improving patent valuations for management purposes--validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales (2004, background): “Unfortunately, the ‘scope’ variable turns out to be an insignificant regressor in many of the subsequent surveys.6 Guellec and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (2000) and Harhoff and Reitzig (2002) computed further indicators speaking to patent-specific economic considerations, such as referring t”
• Environmental policy stringency and technological innovation: evidence from survey data and patent counts (2012, background): “See Guellec and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie ( 2000 ) and Harhoff et al .”
• Environmental Regulation, Government R&D Funding and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China Provincial Data (2018, background): “Guellec (2000) hypothesized that direct subsidy will have a positive effect on enterprise R&D and tax incentive policy will have indirect positive effect on R&D [28].”