Relationship between plant hydraulic and biochemical properties derived from a steady‐state coupled water and carbon transport model

By Gabriel G. Katul, R. Leuning, Ram Oren. 2003

227 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/972e265e772a7edb8e8067501e10454b86c4f3c3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

In Global and Planetary Change

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? (2008, background): “The long-term structural adjustments that maintain homeostasis between water supply, water demand, and plant metabolism (Whitehead & Jarvis, 1981; Cinnirella et al., 2002; Katul et al., 2003; Bréda et al., 2006) may all play a role in the survival or mortality of plants during drought.”
An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. (2010, background): “…it has been repeatedly observed that the gs-to-Anet ratio shifts in drought conditions (Brodribb 1996; Lawlor & Cornic 2002; Medrano et al. 2002; Katul et al. 2003; MacFarlane et al. 2004; Urban et al. 2006; Damour, Vandame & Urban 2008), which seriously limits the generalization of the use of…”
Effects of stand age and tree species on canopy transpiration and average stomatal conductance of boreal forests (2005, background): “When maximum hydraulic conductance is reduced, GS and EL follow with the possibility of reduced carbon uptake (Hubbard, Bond, & Ryan 1999; Katul et al. 2003).”
Xylem hydraulic physiology: the functional backbone of terrestrial plant productivity. (2009, background): “Not only is coordination apparently general amongst vascular plants, but the ratio of K and A seems to be conservative in C3 plants, suggesting convergence upon an optimal strategy [24,47,48].”
Biological constraints on water transport in the soil–plant–atmosphere system (2013, methodology): “As a first approximation, the soil–root conductance per unit ground area, gS-R (m s 1 Pa (1)), can be calculated as [55]”
Modelling C3 and C4 photosynthesis under water-stressed conditions (2008, background): “The first one is here described through a simple cylindrical model (Katul et al. 2003), including soil hydraulic conductivity, Ks (s), active soil depth, Zr, and root area index, RAI, as”
Different ability of three Mediterranean oak species to tolerate progressive water stress (2006, background): “Modulation of gas exchange in relation to the variation of hydraulic resistances of leaves, stem, and roots pointed out a well-triggered above- and under-ground mechanism allowing a good water balance for oak species (Bucci et al. 2003, Buckley et al. 2003, Katul et al. 2003, Lo Gullo et al. 2003).”
Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modelling stomatal conductance (2011, background): “…evidence is accumulating that photosynthetic capacity and maximal stomatal conductance are related to plant hydraulic architecture (e.g. Nardini & Salleo, 2000; Clearwater & Meinzer, 2001; Hubbard et al. 2001; Katul et al. 2003; Mencuccini, 2003; Bucci et al. 2005; Taylor & Eamus, 2008).”