Effects of stand age and tree species on canopy transpiration and average stomatal conductance of boreal forests

285 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Quantifying structural and physiological controls on variation in canopy transpiration among planted pine and hardwood species in the southern Appalachians (2011, methodology): “The stand was unmanaged until 2001 when a small area of the watershed (¾2 ha) was cut to stop the spread of southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis Z.).”
The hydraulic limitation hypothesis revisited. (2006, methodology): “…more integrated measurement methods [canopy conductance (Gs) estimated from whole tree sap flow] also failed to support hydraulic limitations to gas exchange (Phillips et al. 2001; Fischer et al. 2002; Barnard & Ryan 2003; Ewers et al. 2005), and results are inconsistent even within a species.”
On the dynamics of canopy resistance: Generalized linear estimation and relationships with primary micrometeorological variables (2010, methodology): “Furthermore, research on the VPD and soil moisture response of rc has been shown to match plant hydraulic theory well [Whitehead, 1998; Oren et al., 1999; Ewers et al., 2005; Franks, 2004], which is recently being integrated into models of transpiration and by implication of ETa [Mackay et al.”