From Temporary Help Jobs to Permanent Employment: What Can We Learn from Matching Estimators and Their Sensitivity?

By Andrea Ichino, Fabrizia Mealli, T. Nannicini. Social Science Research Network, 2008

707 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The diffusion of Temporary Work Agency (TWA) jobs originated a harsh policy debate and ambiguous empirical evidence. Results for the US, based on quasi-experimental evidence, suggest that a TWA assignment decreases the probability of finding a stable job, while results for Europe, based on the Conditional Independence Assumption (CIA), typically reach opposite conclusions. Using data for two Italian regions, we use a matching estimator to show that TWA assignments can be an effective springboard to permanent employment. We also propose a simulation-based sensitivity analysis, which highlights that only for one of these two regions our results are robust to specific failures of the CIA. We conclude that European studies based on the CIA should not be automatically discarded, but should be put under the scrutiny of a sensitivity analysis like the one we propose.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9599f449ca5f1d3d581cceebe1fe790c0ee1bc4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. M. Maertens
  2. Jo Swinnen
  3. Maren Duvendack
  4. R. Palmer-jones
  5. Sabine Kopeinig
  6. Marco Caliendo
  7. Pao-Li Chang
  8. Oscar A. Mitnik

Citations in the corpus