The effectiveness of the US endangered species act: An econometric analysis using matching methods

By Paul J. Ferraro, Craig McIntosh, Monica Ospina. 2007

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b9d42d6b758821b5cdd7d87b78abfef4ce975d91

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program (2012, methodology): “2 Preprocessing follows Ho et al. (2007); other analyses of conservation program effectiveness using matching include those by Pfaff, Robalino, and Sánchez-Azofeifa (2008), Andam et al. (2008, 2010), Costello, Gaines, and Lynham (2008), and Ferraro, McIntosh, and Ospina (2007).”
Quasi-experimental and experimental approaches to environmental economics (2009, background): “[31] for an analysis of the ESA’s effectiveness at protecting species.”
Trends and biases in the listing and recovery planning for threatened species: an Australian case study (2012, background): “…groups we found that plant, fish, reptile and invertebrate species are under-represented, © 2012 Fauna & Flora International, Oryx, 47(1), 134–143 consistent with the biased composition of other national threatened species lists (Metrick &Weitzman, 1996; Ferraro et al., 2007; Zamin et al., 2010).”
Strategic environmental disclosure: Evidence from the DOE's voluntary greenhouse gas registry ☆ (2011, methodology): “Since there are no proper instrumental variables that allow us to estimate the impact of the 1605(b) program using the standard two-step procedure, we turn to propensity score matching, an increasingly popular method for evaluating treatment effects related to environmental issues [6,8,9].”
Paper park performance: Mexico's natural protected areas in the 1990s (2015, background): “…46 4 Lagunas de Zempoala 12 0 Los Marmoles 22 14 Malinche o Matlalcueyatl 42 10 Nevado de Toluca 45 22 Pico de Orizabaa 17 0 Total 332 14 Region 9 Benito Juarez 7 0 Bonampak 11 0 who fear the expansion of protection (Baylis et al., 2013; Lueck and Michael, 2003; Ferraro et al., 2007).”
Voluntary Environmental Regulation in Developing Countries: Mexico’s Clean Industry Program (2010, background): “Matching controls for nonrandom selection into the program (Rosenbaum and Rubin 1983; Ferraro et al. 2007; List et al. 2003; Dehejia and Wahba 2002).”