Don't stereotype, think different! Overcoming automatic stereotype activation by mindset priming
By Kai Sassenberg, G. Moskowitz. 2005
256 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/958bbdf8c392898cacdc9e5dcdb5f2661b2c2452
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- N. Roese
- K. Epstude
- M. Gocłowska
- Matthew J. Lindberg
- R. Crisp
- Adam D. Galinsky
- Tom Meyvis
- Kathleen D. Vohs
In Social Psychology
- M. Gocłowska
- Adam D. Galinsky
- Laura J. Kray
- R. Crisp
- Tom Meyvis
- Ryan Hamilton
- A. Sellier
- Kathleen D. Vohs
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Content and process priming: A review ☆ (2014, unknown): “Sassenberg and Moskowitz (2005) show how a " think different " prime can interfere with automatic stereotype activation (though this could be goal priming).”
- Being of two minds: Switching mindsets exhausts self-regulatory resources (2011, background): “The mindset construct has been invoked to explain phenomena as diverse as goal pursuit (Gollwitzer, 1990), inference making (Fiedler, Schenck, Watling, & Menges, 2005), interpersonal relationships (Gagne & Lydon, 2001), stereotyping (Sassenberg & Moskowitz, 2005), and fairness (Van Den Bos, 2002).”
- The Functional Theory of Counterfactual Thinking (2008, background): “…processing style, whereas the prevention focus associated with subtractive counterfactuals elicits a more local processing style, then further differentiation in performance effects might occur (Förster, Friedman, Özelsel, & Denzler, 2006; Förster & Higgins, 2005; Sassenberg & Moskowitz, 2005).”
- How Dual-Identity Processes Foster Creativity (2014, background): “Although this type of thinking provides efficiency in information processing (Macrae, Milne, & Bodenhausen, 1994), it can, at the same time, stifle the range of ideas that one has access to at any one time (Gocłowska, Crisp & Labuchagne, 2013; Sassenberg & Moskowitz, 2005; S. M. Smith et al., 1993).”
- Implications of Counterfactual Structure for Creative Generation and Analytical Problem Solving (2007, background): “Similarly, having people describe three times when they had behaved creatively prevents stereotypes and associations in general from becoming automatically activated ( Sassenberg & Moskowitz, 2005 ).”