PROJECTED OFFENDING AND CONTEMPORANEOUS RULE‐VIOLATION: IMPLICATIONS FOR HETEROTYPIC CONTINUITY*
By Greg Pogarsky. 2004
222 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9536097716a53926231d702ec887f3d125004bce
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Cheryl Lero Jonson
- A. Schoepfer
- Allison T. Chappell
- Paul Benjamin Lowry
- F. Cullen
- Brian K. Payne
- Alex R. Piquero
- Jeffrey A. Bouffard
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Alex R. Piquero
- Nicole Leeper Piquero
- Jeffrey A. Bouffard
- A. Schoepfer
- Justin T. Pickett
- Allison T. Chappell
- F. Cullen
- Brian K. Payne
In Sociology and Political Science
- Alex R. Piquero
- F. Cullen
- Nicole Leeper Piquero
- Stephanie E Carmichael
- Jeffrey A. Bouffard
- A. Schoepfer
- Justin T. Pickett
- Amanda Graham
Citations in the corpus
- Why Managers Fail to Do the Right Thing (2007, background): “Pogarsky (2004), for instance, recently compared hypothetical offending intentions with observed heterotypic behavior (cheating) using an experimental design.”
- Self-Control, Moral Beliefs, and Criminal Activity (2006, result): “Although we readily acknowledge that the use of hypothetical circumstances is not necessarily equivalent to reality, previous research has revealed a strong correlation between intentions and actual behavior (Green 1989; Kim and Hunter 1993; Pogarsky 2004).”
- Something Old, Something New: A Preliminary Investigation of Hirschi’s Redefined Self‐Control (2007, background): “Pogarsky (2004) demonstrated the validity of “intentions to offend” measures when he linked such responses to actual deviance in the same study.”
- Integrating the desire–for–control and rational choice in a corporate crime context (2005, unknown): “Green (1989), for example, showed that the correlation between projected and actual behaviors was over r = .80, and a recent study by Pogarsky (2004) showed that respondents’ intentions to offend in a hypothetical scenario were strongly and positively correlated with whether they cheated in a…”
- examining the role of differential association and techniques of neutralization in explaining corporate crime (2005, background): “Extant research shows a strong correlation between projected and actual behavior (Green 1989 ; Kim and Hunter 1993 ), and Pogarsky's ( 2004 ) recent research details this relationship.”
- Future directions for behavioral information security research (2013, background): “In particular, scenarios are finding use in Behavioral InfoSec research (Siponen and Vance, 2010) and such usage could rise, as scenarios provide an opportunity to capture anti-social and unethical behavior (Pogarsky, 2004; Siponen and Vance, 2010).”
- Using Student Samples in Criminological Research (2008, methodology): “Pogarsky (2004) used a multi-method approach integrating a survey and a laboratory experiment with students to see if students’ projections about committing an offense (measured through a survey) were related to cheating/lying during the laboratory experiment in order to get a cash bonus.”
- Sanctions, Perceived Anger, and Criminal Offending (2004, result): “Although we readily acknowledge that the use of hypothetical circumstances is not necessarily equivalent to reality, previous research has revealed a strong correlation between intentions and actual behavior (Green, 1989; Kim and Hunter, 1993; Pogarsky, 2004).”