Can Psychology Help Save the World? A Model for Conservation Psychology
By S. Clayton, Amara T. Brook. 2005
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94ec216e7fc10381e1d7e24533fc429e3b05bdaa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour can both Thwart and Foster Well-Being (2013, unknown): “One of the arguments that is used to explain why pro-environmental action would bring more hedonic well-being is that pro-environmental behaviour leads to better environmental conditions, and people can live a more comfortable life under better environmental conditions [47,48].”
- Environmental Sustainability at Work: A Call to Action (2012, background): “There are large bodies of literature examining both individual and contextual variables that contribute to environmental degradation (e.g., Clayton & Brook, 2005; Oskamp, 2000) and environmental sustainability (Steg & Vlek, 2009; Stern, 2000).”
- Motivational functionalism and urban conservation stewardship: implications for volunteer involvement (2012, background): “One such insight, as illustrated in this study and elsewhere (e.g., Clayton & Brook 2005; Saunders et al. 2006; Mayer & Frantz 2008), is the importance of assessing volunteers’ motivations and the salience of the motivations’ influences on desired behaviors.”
- Psychology's essential role in alleviating the impacts of climate change. (2008, background): “Second, we must engage policymakers (Clayton & Brook, 2005).”
- Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: Implications for biodiversity management and conservation (2007, background): “…is still known about the way in which individuals’ concepts of biodiversity and nature are related to their attitudes with regard to these issues (Henwood and Pidgeon, 2001; Clayton and Brook, 2005), a crucial aspect with regard to public acceptance and support of biodiversity management measures.”
- Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges A Report by the American Psychological Association's Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change Members (2009, background): “This level of analyses is relevant for understanding the human-causes of climate change because it is the collective impact of human behaviors that are contributing to climate change (Clayton & Brook, 2005; Gifford, 2008).”
- Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice (2011, background): “…(American Psychological Association, 2009) and of many environmental problems (cf. Oskamp, 2000); thus, it is critical that researchers identify motives for human behavior toward the natural environment (Clayton & Brook, 2005; Gifford, 2008; Mascia et al., 2003; Saunders, Brook, & Myers, 2006).”
- Invasive plant suppresses charismatic seabird - the construction of attitudes towards biodiversity management options. (2007, unknown): “…these preferences, i.e., the construction of attitudes with regard to biodiversity management, as well as their stability over time, remain poorly understood, as social scientific approaches are still not tightly linked to conservation-related topics (Mascia et al., 2003; Clayton and Brook, 2005).”
- Conservation Volunteers' Connection to Nature (2009, unknown): “Several researchers argue that understanding the psychological relationship between people and nature is needed to create an environmentally sustainable society ( Saunders, 2003 ; Clayton & Brook, 2005 ).”