Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour can both Thwart and Foster Well-Being
By Leonie A. Venhoeven, J. Bolderdijk, L. Steg. 2013
191 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Although pro-environmental behaviour is often believed to be difficult, aggravating, and potentially threatening one’s quality of life, recent studies suggest that people who behave in a more pro-environmental way are actually more satisfied with their lives. In this manuscript, we aim to explain this apparent paradox by reviewing theoretical arguments and empirical evidence for both sides of the coin: why would acting pro-environmentally decrease one’s well-being, and why would it increase one’s well-being? We conclude that part of the answer lies in a different view on what well-being entails, and more specifically, whether the focus is on hedonic well-being ( i.e ., feeling pleasure) or eudaimonic well-being ( i.e. , feeling meaningful).
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9a16a26a366a0b5a12dfba00edc9d74709b5f28
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- C. Capaldi
- R. Dopko
- W. Sheate
- Ute B. Thiermann
- John M. Zelenski
- L. Steg
- Richard M. Ryan
- J. D. de Groot
In Social Psychology
- John M. Zelenski
- Cody R. DeHaan
- W. Sheate
- Ute B. Thiermann
- C. Capaldi
- Laura Wray‐Lake
- L. Steg
- J. Shubert
Citations in the corpus
- The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis (2014, background): “A review of how pro-environmental behaviors can influence well-being in both positive and negatives ways by Venhoeven et al. (2013) hints that it might as research “suggests that engaging in pro-environmental behavior may have especially negative consequences for hedonic well-being, but mainly…”
- Examining links from civic engagement to daily well-being from a self-determination theory perspective (2019, background): “Pro-environmental behaviors are theorized to enhance well-being (Kasser, 2009; Venhoeven et al., 2013), and crosssectional evidence revealed a positive correlation between pro-environmental behaviors and happiness, life satisfaction, and positive affect (Brown & Kasser, 2005).”
- Values, Norms, and Intrinsic Motivation to Act Proenvironmentally (2016, background): “This implies that people can be intrinsically motivated to engage in proenvironmental actions, because they derive pleasure from doing the right thing and by benefiting the environment (14, 45, 49).”
- The Way Forward in Mindfulness and Sustainability: a Critical Review and Research Agenda (2020, background): “Brown and Kasser’s (2005) work feds into the growing understanding that, contrary to popular beliefs, ecological behaviours can promote well-being rather than deteriorating it (Venhoeven et al. 2013).”