Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour can both Thwart and Foster Well-Being

By Leonie A. Venhoeven, J. Bolderdijk, L. Steg. 2013

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Although pro-environmental behaviour is often believed to be difficult, aggravating, and potentially threatening one’s quality of life, recent studies suggest that people who behave in a more pro-environmental way are actually more satisfied with their lives. In this manuscript, we aim to explain this apparent paradox by reviewing theoretical arguments and empirical evidence for both sides of the coin: why would acting pro-environmentally decrease one’s well-being, and why would it increase one’s well-being? We conclude that part of the answer lies in a different view on what well-being entails, and more specifically, whether the focus is on hedonic well-being ( i.e ., feeling pleasure) or eudaimonic well-being ( i.e. , feeling meaningful).

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9a16a26a366a0b5a12dfba00edc9d74709b5f28

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. W. Sheate
  2. Ute B. Thiermann
  3. Cody R. DeHaan
  4. Laura Wray‐Lake
  5. J. Shubert
  6. L. Steg
  7. R. Dopko
  8. C. Capaldi

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

  1. C. Capaldi
  2. R. Dopko
  3. W. Sheate
  4. Ute B. Thiermann
  5. John M. Zelenski
  6. L. Steg
  7. Richard M. Ryan
  8. J. D. de Groot

In Social Psychology

  1. John M. Zelenski
  2. Cody R. DeHaan
  3. W. Sheate
  4. Ute B. Thiermann
  5. C. Capaldi
  6. Laura Wray‐Lake
  7. L. Steg
  8. J. Shubert

Citations in the corpus