THE MEANINGS OF TRUST

By D. Harrison McKnight, Norman L. Chervany, H. Humphrey. 2000

844 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94b195e28b47836957f23dfcae00f1f315733285

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Review on Computational Trust and Reputation Models (2005, background): “There are several works that help to give a precise and distinct meaning to both concepts (McKnight and Chervany 1996; Conte and Paolucci 2002; Mui et al. 2002).”
A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspective (2022, background): “Despite trust being a concept widely studied across many disciplines (Mcknight & Chervany, 1996), the definition, importance and measurement of user trust in AI-enabled systems are not yet as well agreed on and studied (Bauer, 2019; Sousa et al., 2016).”
Consumer acceptance of internet banking: the influence of internet trust (2008, background): “Accordingly, online trust is most often defined as a belief or expectation about the web site, the web vendor and/or (less frequently) the internet as the trusted party or object of trust or as a behavioural intention or willingness to depend or rely on the trusted party (McKnight and Chervany, 1996”
A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision (2007, methodology): “6 Called bsystem trustQ in McKnight and Chervany [46]. good car mechanicQ, which can be grouped under the provision trust class.”
A trust evaluation framework in distributed networks: Vulnerability analysis and defense against attacks (2006, methodology): “As pointed out in [28], many belief formation processes may generate belief as well as the confidence of belief.”
Using Trust for Secure Collaboration in Uncertain Environments (2003, background): “ward [9], many of which are dependent on the context in which trust is examined, or the viewpoint that the author adopts.”
Teacher‐principal relationships: Exploring linkages between empowerment and interpersonal trust (2005, background): “A shift from more formal relationships to more personal, informal relationships, may demonstrate the supervisor’s confidence in employees, and convey the belief that management trusts them and encourages individual work initiatives (McKnight and Chervany, 1996).”
Supporting trust in virtual communities (2000, background): “This has given rise to an evident lack of coherence among researchers in the definition of trust [MC96].”
A roadmap for security challenges in the Internet of Things (2017, background): “A second de ﬁ nition was introduced in [93] about decision trust, and stipulates that “ Trust is the extent to which one party is willing to depend on something or somebody in a given situation with a feeling of relative security, even though negative consequences are possible ” .”
Analysing the Relationship between Risk and Trust (2004, methodology): “For the purpose of this study the following working definition inspired by McKnight and Chervany’s work [12] will be used:”
Trust and Information Sharing in Supply Chains (2012, unknown): “Since the literature on trust suggests that the rates of gain or loss of trust may not be symmetric (Wrightsman 1991; McKnight and Chervany 1996) , we model δ via two separate parameters, one for gains δ g , and one for losses δ l , such that: δ = δ g if |d k − Q r * k | ≥ |d k − ˜ Q s * k | δ l if…”
A Survey on Trust Management for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (2011, background): “Before reviewing the literature, we would like to clarify some terminologies that have been used interchangeably but sometimes confusingly in the context of trust management.”
Empirical research in on-line trust: a review and critical assessment (2003, methodology): “Following the trust typology proposed by McKnight and Chervany (1996) this type of trust is called dispositional trust.”
PeerTrust: supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities (2004, background): “The factors that determine the threshold TthresholdðwÞ include how much peer w is willing to trust others, a manifest of dispositional trust [23], the extent to which an entity has a consistent tendency to trust across a broad spectrum of situations andentities.”
A survey of trust in computer science and the Semantic Web (2007, background): “These qualities share predictability and integrity with McKnight and Chervany's set, and add five more new characteristics specific to the management domain: congruity (actions match claims), reliability, openness (do not keep secrets), acceptance (equal respect among diversity), and sensitivity (pa”
Trust in a specific technology: An investigation of its components and measures (2011, background): “Perhaps the most basic dictionary meaning of trust is to depend or rely on another [McKnight and Chervany 1996].”
Trust in managerial relationships (2003, background): “) leading to homonymy ( McKnight and Chervany, 1996”