Methods and Materials for teaching the gifted

By Suzanne M. Bean. 2000

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore (2003, unknown): “…instruction (Erickson, 1998), problem-based learning (Delisle, 1997), and constructivist pedagogy (Brooks & Brooks, 1995), to improve student achievement (Bechtol & Sorenson, 1993; Bloom, 1976; Feldhusen, 1989; Kaplan, 1986, 2001; Renzulli, 1988,1994; VanTassel-Baska, 1986; Walberg, 1985).”
Teachers' Conceptions of Creativity and Creative Students. (2005, result): “It should be noted however, that recent research disagrees with our teachers’ efficacy toward teaching creativity (Amabile, 1996; Annarella, 1999; Fleith, 1999; Karnes & Bean, 2001; Plucker & Nowak, 2001; Robinson, 2001).”
Smart People or Smart Contexts? Cognition, Ability, and Talent Development in an Age of Situated Approaches to Knowing and Learning (2002, background): “…these broader theories (e.g., Renzulli & Reis’s, 1985, Schoolwide Enrichment Model, several of the strategies described in Coleman & Cross, 2001, and Karnes & Bean, 2001) are becoming more prevalent, but the traditional pull-out or “find the gifted child” model remains a common 1 We see the same…”