Event‐related fMRI study of response inhibition

By Peter F. Liddle, Kent A. Kiehl, Andra M. Smith. Human Brain Mapping, 2001

642 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9396c87bba2546176ff91e20db4db3707e003bf2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

The Effect of Preceding Context on Inhibition: An Event-Related fMRI Study (2002, methodology): “Numerous imaging studies have shown that these areas are involved in response inhibition, using such paradigms as the go nogo and stop signal task (e.g., Casey et al., 1997; Garavan et al., 1999; Konishi et al., 1999; Liddle et al., 2001; Rubia et al., 2000).”
An event-related fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks (2001, background): “Supplementary motor cortex and cerebellum are engaged during both go and no-go trials of a go/no-go task (Liddle et al., 2001), indicating that both of these brain regions are engaged when a decision between responding and nonresponding is required.”
Attentional systems in target and distractor processing: a combined ERP and fMRI study (2004, positive): “The anterior cingulate participates in the effortful initiation of motor response as well as in the inhibition of motor responses (as shown in the go/no-go paradigm (Liddle et al., 2001)).”
The Common Neural Basis of Exerting Self-Control in Multiple Domains (2009, neutral): “…(or the inferior frontal cortex within the VLPFC; IFC) during successful no-go (Garavan et al., 2002; Garavan et al., 1999; Konishi et al., 1998; Liddle et al., 2001; Menon et al., 2001) and stop-signal (Aron & Poldrack, 2006; Chevrier et al., 2007; Rubia et al., 2003) performance (for a…”
Activation of Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus during Response Inhibition across Response Modalities (2007, methodology): “…Deakin, & Woodruff, 2003; Maguire et al., 2003; Mostofsky et al., 2003; Garavan, Ross, Murphy, Roche, & Stein, 2002; Watanabe et al., 2002; Braver et al., 2001; Liddle et al., 2001; Menon et al., 2001; Rubia et al., 2001; de Zubicaray et al., 2000; Garavan et al., 1999; Konishi et al., 1998).”
Body mass correlates inversely with inhibitory control in response to food among adolescent girls: An fMRI study (2010, positive): “As noted, these different regions are part of a distributed frontal lobe inhibitory control network and have been commonly implicated in response inhibition during go/no-go tasks (Buchsbaum et al., 2005; Liddle et al., 2001; Mostofsky et al., 2003; Simmonds et al., 2008; Aron and Poldrack, 2005; Hor”
Cortical and limbic activation during viewing of high- versus low-calorie foods (2003, result): “This would be consistent with studies showing prefrontal activation during inhibitory (e.g., no/nogo) tasks (Liddle, Kiehl, and Smith, 2001) and the position that prefrontal activation may be involved in the inhibition of food intake (Del Parigi et al., 2002).”
Progressive increase of frontostriatal brain activation from childhood to adulthood during event‐related tasks of cognitive control (2006, background): “Mesial frontal cortex, including anterior cingulate gyrus, has commonly been found to be activated in healthy adults during Go/no-go task performance [Durston et al., 2002b; Garavan et al., 1999; Kiehl et al., 2000; Liddle et al., 2001; Menon et al., 2001; Rubia et al., 2001] and may reflect the rol”
Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition (2008, result): “However, most of these studies, as well as others [19-26] did observe activations in bilateral dorso- and ventrolateral PFC, as well as medial PFC.”
Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks (2011, result): “However, most of these studies, as well as others that followed (Liddle et al., 2001; Menon et al., 2001; Rubia et al., 2001; Wager et al., 2005; Watanabe et al., 2002) did observe activations in bilateral dorsolateral and ventrolateral PFC, as well as the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and pre-sup”
Neural development of selective attention and response inhibition (2003, methodology): “Studies using the go no-go paradigm in normal adults suggest that the anterior cingulate is not involved directly in response inhibition, but rather in monitoring performance (Braver et al., 2001; Kiehl et al., 2000; Liddle et al., 2001).”
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition (2006, background): “Such conflicts typically elicit increased response errors and engage slower, more controlled patterns of respons”
tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review (2011, background): “…are mainly found in cognitive regions and less so in motor regions where cortical motor projections are almost always contralateral; bilateral activity is reported in several cognitive functions such as executive functions (Sylvester et al. 2003) and response inhibition (Liddle et al. 2001).”
Motion correction and the use of motion covariates in multiple‐subject fMRI analysis (2006, methodology): “These brain regions have been found to make up part of a network involved in manual response selection and inhibition [e.g., Liddle et al., 2001].”