The Effect of Preceding Context on Inhibition: An Event-Related fMRI Study

By Sarah Durston, Kathleen M. Thomas, M. Worden, Yihong Yang, B. Casey. NeuroImage, 2002

357 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e16b33cefbb233748bbfd0ee1f20d06f3192d565

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

The brain basis of emotion: A meta-analytic review (2012, background): “Tasks involving conflict include those where individuals are asked to inhibit a prepotent motor response (such as in the classic “go/no go” task; e.g., Braver et al. 2001; Durston et al. 2002), to process competing sensory stimulus arrays (such as in the classic “Stroop” task, e.”
Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. (2004, methodology): “Although these studies encourage the idea that conflict-related activation lies outside the ACC, it should be noted that they used a version of the go/no-go task, a task which has been clearly shown to engage the ACC in humans [ 16 ,18].”
Integration of cognitive and motivational context information in the primate prefrontal cortex. (2007, background): “Human neuroimaging studies also indicate the importance of LPFC in processing cognitive context information (Durston et al. 2002; Bunge et al. 2003; Sakai and Passingham 2003, 2006).”
Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function (2007, neutral): “& Dumanoir, 2000; Durston, Thomas, Worden, Yang, & Casey, 2002 ), as well as in other”
The development of executive function in childhood (2008, background): “, 2005) the number of go trials preceding a no-go trial (Durston et al., 2002) and time pressure (Simpson & Riggs, 2006) and therefore differences in the stimuli, response demands, or even the type of analyses used, may have contributed to”
Response Inhibition and Response Selection: Two Sides of the Same Coin (2008, methodology): “…no-go activation in the IFC have used such stimuli as numbers (Fassbender et al., 2004), letters (Garavan et al., 1999, 2006), cartoon characters (Durston et al., 2002), or an array of colored shapes (Booth et al., 2003, Konishi et al., 1999) with arbitrary stimulus–response associations, unlike…”
Differential patterns of striatal activation in young children with and without ADHD. (2003, methodology): “We manipulated task difficulty within a go/nogo paradigm by parametrically varying the number of go trials preceding a nogo trial (Durston et al 2002a).”
Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. (2013, methodology): “Durston et al. (2002) used fMRI and presented either 1, 3 or 5 go trials prior to a no-go trial.”
Right inferior prefrontal cortex mediates response inhibition while mesial prefrontal cortex is responsible for error detection (2003, background): “, 2001) or bilateral activation (Durston et al., 2002) in dorsolateral and inferior prefrontal cortices and superior and inferior parietal lobes.”
Interference resolution: Insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks (2007, background): “Although future research will be needed to test these hypotheses and add further to our understanding of how each region performs interference resolution, our data suggest that the right IFG is important during response execution, the right DLPFC and ACC during response selection, and the left…”