INTEGRATING PHYLOGENETICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL NICHE MODELS TO EXPLORE SPECIATION MECHANISMS IN DENDROBATID FROGS

By Catherine H. Graham, S. Ron, Juan C. Santos, C. Schneider, C. Moritz. Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2004

642 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Genetics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92e46163468956eb910877069180754af2eb7437

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Jane Elith
2. Antoine Guisan
3. A. Townsend Peterson
4. Catherine H. Graham
5. Miguel B. Araújo
6. Wilfried Thuiller
7. Rune Halvorsen
8. Jorge M. Lobo

In Genetics

1. Catherine H. Graham
2. A. Townsend Peterson
3. D. Nogués-Bravo
4. Jane Elith
5. John J. Wiens
6. J. Leathwick
7. J. W. Sites
8. K. Marske

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Antoine Guisan
2. A. Townsend Peterson
3. Jane Elith
4. John J. Wiens
5. Catherine H. Graham
6. A. Stigall
7. J. Leathwick
8. Robert J. Hijmans

Citations in the corpus

• Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time (2009, positive): “SDMs are still regularly used for such purposes, particularly in quantitative ecological studies (Leathwick & Austin 2001) and evolutionary biology (Graham et al. 2004b).”
• Modelling ecological niches with support vector machines (2006, background): “…climate change (Thomas et al. 2004) and invasion by introduced species (Peterson 2003; Drake & Bossenbroek 2004), testing evolutionary hypotheses (Graham et al. 2004), identifying reservoirs for disease (Peterson et al. 2002), and planning for conservation in a dynamic landscape (Ferrier…”
• Distribution modelling and statistical phylogeography: an integrative framework for generating and testing alternative biogeographical hypotheses (2007, methodology): “Biases in terms of where the samples are collected can affect the model’s output, particularly if some areas are more accessible than others (reviewed in Graham et al., 2004b), as can the choice of environmental data and modelling algorithm (Araújo & Guisan, 2006).”
• Species’ Distribution Modeling for Conservation Educators and Practitioners (2010, background): “Exploring speciation mechanisms Kozak and Wiens 2006, Graham et al. 2004b”
• Applications of species distribution modeling to paleobiology (2011, background): “…the possibility for investigating core theoretical issues in ecology (Svenning et al., 2008b, 2010; Oswald et al., 2010) and evolutionary biology (Graham et al., 2004; Nogués-Bravo et al., 2008; Paul et al., 2009) and has important applications to conservation and global change biology (Thomas…”
• PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE) (2006, background): “In the most recent contribution to dendrobatid phylogenetics, Graham et al. (2004) added 12S, tRNAval, and 16S mtDNA sequences from a specimen collected near the type locality of Epipedobates tricolor and analyzed them with the data from Santos et al. (2003).”
• Phylogenetic Methods in Biogeography (2011, positive): “Combined with paleoclimate data, ENM can project range predictions into the past (Evans et al. 2009, Graham et al. 2004, Smith & Donoghue 2010, Yesson & Culham 2006), which is clearly relevant for biogeographic reconstructions (Peterson et al. 1999, Smith & Donoghue 2010, Waltari et al. 2007,…”