Applications of species distribution modeling to paleobiology

By Jens‐Christian Svenning, Camilla Fløjgaard, K. Marske, D. Nogués-Bravo, S. Normand. 2011

330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b391c18691da97d1b4daf898216f8212b3a91a62

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Climatic niche shifts between species' native and naturalized ranges raise concern for ecological forecasts during invasions and climate change (2014, background): “…of species’ distributions to measure species’ environmental tolerances is one of the most fundamental techniques in biogeography, and is particularly important in climate-change ecology and invasion biology (Wiens et al., 2010; Araújo et al., 2011; Svenning et al., 2011; Petitpierre et al., 2012).”
The historical connections between the Amazon and the Atlantic Forest revisited (2017, methodology): “Second, they made no use of molec- ular studies or fossil/palaeopalynological records, which could be employed for ENM validation and hypothesis testing (Collevatti et al., 2013; Svenning, Fløjgaard, Marske, N ogues-Bravo & Normand, 2011; Werneck et al., 2011).”
What ' s on the horizon for macroecology? (2012, methodology): “Hind-casting of species distributions based on reconstructions of past climates by techniques of ‘ ecological niche modeling ’ (Elith and Leathwick 2009), in particular, is an increasingly employed method with great potential, but also many pitfalls (Nogues-Bravo 2009, Svenning et al. 2011).”
Modeling Species and Community Responses to Past, Present, and Future Episodes of Climatic and Ecological Change (2015, methodology): “Dispersal limitations, biotic interactions, and source-sink dynamics may restrict species from occupying suitable environments (Svenning et al. 2011).”
Using species distribution models in paleobiogeography: A matter of data, predictors and concepts (2011, background): “…research (ISI Web of knowledge, September 2010; Search criteria: species distribution model+fossil, species distribution model+last glacial maximum, species distribution model+Pleistocene) we found a total of forty-two papers (Tables 1 and 2; see also Nogues-Bravo, 2009; Svenning et al., 2011).”
Drawbacks to palaeodistribution modelling: the case of South American seasonally dry forests (2013, background): “Although the fossil record is also an important source of evidence of palaeodistributions, it is usually spatially and temporally sparse (Nogués-Bravo, 2009; Svenning et al., 2011; Varela et al., 2011).”
A comparison between Ensemble and MaxEnt species distribution modelling approaches for conservation: A case study with Egyptian medicinal plants (2020, background): “…2006; Pearson and Dawson, 2003), assisting with conservation and management plans (Engler et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2012) and investigating key issues in related disciplines such as paleobiology (Svenning et al., 2011), taxonomy (Kharouba et al., 2013) and biogeography (Guisan et al., 2006).”