PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS OF DART-POISON FROGS AND THEIR RELATIVES (AMPHIBIA: ATHESPHATANURA: DENDROBATIDAE)

By Taran Grant, D. Frost, J. Caldwell, Ron Gagliardo, Célio Fernando Baptista Haddad, Philippe J. R. Kok, D. B. Means, B. Noonan, W. Schargel, Ward C. Wheeler. 2006

612 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3e47a27d2965f4d5a84c0625e8521996247038c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Anuran Species Composition and Distribution Patterns in Brazilian Cerrado, a Neotropical Hotspot (2012, background): “…found, are related to Atlantic Forest lineages. phylogenetic relationships phylogenetic relationships among cerrado species are still poorly known, since most were not included in recent comprehensive phylogenies (Faivovich et al. 2005; Frost et al. 2006; Grant et al. 2006; heinicke et al. 2007).”
A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. (2011, methodology): “…bufonid frogs (Pauly et al., 2004; Pramuk et al., 2008; Van Bocxlaer et al., 2009), centrolenid frogs (Guayasamin et al., 2009), dendrobatid frogs (Grant et al., 2006; Santos et al., 2009), hemiphractid frogs (Wiens et al., 2007a), hylid frogs (Faivovich et al., 2005, 2010; Wiens et al., 2005b,…”
Integrative inventory of Bolivia’s lowland anurans reveals hidden diversity (2011, result): “On a broad scale, our analysis supports the results of many other studies (Chek et al. 2001; Grant et al. 2006; Lougheed et al. 2006; Noonan & Wray 2006; Roberts et al. 2006; Fouquet et al. 2007a; Crawford et al. 2010) showing a vast underestimation of species richness in Neotropical anurans.”
Experimental Evidence for Aposematism in the Dendrobatid Poison Frog Oophaga pumilio (2007, methodology): “…natural predators, we conducted a field-based predation experiment using plasticine model replicas of the dendrobatid frog, Oophaga (5Dendrobates; Grant et al., 2006) pumilio, and brown leaf-litter frogs that resemble members of the genus Craugastor (5Eleutherodactylus; Frost et al., 2006) at La…”
Phytotelm size in relation to parental care and mating strategies in two species of Peruvian poison frogs (2008, background): “Poison frogs of the family Dendrobatidae (the authors could not agree upon a working taxonomy (see Grant et al., 2006); therefore, we have chosen to be conservative and use the previously established taxonomy until the matter is further reviewed) display a trend towards increased parental care and…”
Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness (COVER) (2011, background): “However, while several phylogenetic studies have suggested that these subfamilies form a clade (Faivovich et al., 2005; Frost et al., 2006; Grant et al., 2006), others”
Systematics of the Neotropical Genus Leptodactylus Fitzinger, 1826 (Anura: Leptodactylidae): Phylogeny, the Relevance of Non-molecular Evidence, and Species Accounts (2014, background): “, 1991) but is instead deeply nested within an otherwise terrestrial, diurnal clade (Grant et al., 2006).”
Revision of the characters of Centrolenidae (Amphibia: Anura: Athesphatanura), with comments on its taxonomy and the description of new taxa of glassfrogs (2007, background): “However, species currently placed in Cochranella have discrete variation, and two conditions are easily recognized: (i) species with basal webbing (not extending beyond the base of distal subarticular tubercle); and, (ii) species with extensive webbing (extending beyond the distal subarticular tuber”
Phylogenetic Systematics of Dart-Poison Frogs and Their Relatives Revisited (Anura: Dendrobatoidea) (2017, background): “ 41D), to be paraphyletic with respect to the trans-Andean species (Grant et al., 2006; Santos et al., 2009), our analysis corroborates more recent studies that found both trans- and cisAndean groups to be monophyletic (Pyron and Wiens, 2011; Santos et al., 2014).”
Phylogenetic systematics of Glassfrogs (Amphibia: Centrolenidae) and their sister taxon Allophryne ruthveni (2009, background): “…(e.g., Darst & Cannatella 2004; San Mauro et al. 2004; Faivovich et al. 2005; Hillis & Wilcox 2005; Wiens et al. 2005; Frost et al. 2006; Grant et al. 2006; Heinicke et al. 2007; Hedges et al. 2008, Guayasamin et al. 2008a), although not all resulted in new taxonomies (see Padial & De…”