ESTIMATING THE PARAMETERS OF SURVIVAL AND MIGRATION OF INDIVIDUALS IN METAPOPULATIONS
By Ilkka Hanski, J. Alho, Atte Moilanen. 2000
334 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92e26b9cfacfd4a2227a5d8eb644db62869f70f1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
In Ecology
- M. Baguette
- Ilkka Hanski
- T. Tscharntke
- L. Fahrig
- I. Steffan‐Dewenter
- N. Schtickzelle
- T. Wiegand
- Jochen Krauss
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- M. Baguette
- T. Tscharntke
- Ilkka Hanski
- I. Steffan‐Dewenter
- Josef Settele
- L. Fahrig
- N. Schtickzelle
- H. Van Dyck
Citations in the corpus
- Cascading of habitat degradation: Oyster reefs invaded by refugee fishes escaping stress (2001, background): “…of migration of mobile higher trophic-level consumers should be incorporated into the spatially explicit metapopulation models now being applied in species conservation (e.g., Hanski 1999, Mc- June 2001 781CASCADING OF HABITAT DEGRADATION Carthy and Lindenmayer 1999, Hanski et al. 2000).”
- Metapopulation viability analysis of the bog fritillary butterfly using RAMAS/GIS (2004, background): “(2001) parameterised the virtual migration (VM) model (Hanski et al. 2000) on the PL patchy population.”
- Beringia as a glacial refugium for boreal trees and shrubs: new perspectives from mapped pollen data (2005, background): “Current theory (Husband & Barrett, 1996; Hanski, 1999; Cain et al., 2000; Hanski et al., 2000) suggests that the long-term maintenance of disjunct populations requires repeated colonization events from metapopulation pools.”
- Assessment of hypotheses about dispersal in a long-lived seabird using multistate capture–recapture models (2004, background): “The proportion of patches occupied depends on patch extinction and colonization probabilities, which depend clearly on dispersal (Hanski 1999; Hanski, Alho & Moilanen 2000 ).”
- SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY (2002, methodology): “Several studies using this model (Hanski et al. 2000, Petit et al. 2001; N. Wahlberg, unpublished manuscript) have found that typical values for b and c are between 0.1 and 0.5 for butterflies.”
- Metapopulation dynamics and conservation of the marsh fritillary butterfly: Population viability analysis and management options for a critically endangered species in Western Europe (2005, methodology): “We applied the virtual migration (VM) model (Hanski et al., 2000) to the same CMR data set as for intrageneration demography (year 1995 generation in the Baquet metapopulation), as done previously for other butterfly species (Petit et al.”
- The multifarious effects of dispersal and gene flow on contemporary adaptation (2007, background): “First, dispersers may suffer greater en route mortality owing to increased energetic expenditure or predation risk (Alberts & Altmann 1995; Hanski, Alho & Moilanen 2000 ).”
- How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity (2002, background): “…(Baars 1979, Crist et al. 1992, Johnson et al. 1992, Matthysen et al. 1995, Charrier et al. 1997, Pither and Taylor 1998, Jonsen and Taylor 2000, Goodwin and Fahrig 2002) and movement risk (Charrier et al. 1997, Sakai and Noon 1997, St Clair et al. 1998, Zollner and Lima 1999, Hanski et al. 2000).”
- Colonization rates and distances of a host butterfly and two specific parasitoids in a fragmented landscape (2002, positive): “Based on previous mark–recapture data for the Glanville fritillary (Hanski et al. 1994, 2000; Kuussaari et al. 1996), our experimental results on the colonization of host populations by the parasitoid, and natural colonizations over 8 years, we conclude that C. melitaearum has a higher yearly…”
- The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review (2009, result): “The distinction is important, as Ovaskainen (2004) concluded that the statistical VM (virtual migration) model of Hanski et al. (2000) underestimated time spent dispersing in the matrix, with resulting overestimation of time spent in the patch, compared to his (Ovaskainen 2004) mechanistic…”
- Up or down in space? Uniting the bottom-up versus top-down paradigm and spatial ecology (2007, background): “In other words, individuals should be allowed to move among sites (as they tend to do in nature), with the probability of immigration and emigration scaled to landscape configuration (Hanski et al. 2000).”
- Population history and life history influence the migration rate of female Glanville fritillary butterflies (2002, methodology): “Emigration rate from a habitat patch decreases and immigration rate to a patch increases with patch area (Kuussaari et al. 1996, Hanski et al. 2000 ).”
- How does landscape context contribute to effects of habitat fragmentation on diversity and population density of butterflies? (2003, methodology): “The formula is based on Hanski et al. (2000), and was used in a simpler form with a ¼ 1 and b ¼ 1 by Hanski et al. (1994) and Steffan-Dewenter & Tscharntke (2000).”