How does landscape context contribute to effects of habitat fragmentation on diversity and population density of butterflies?

By Jochen Krauss, I. Steffan‐Dewenter, T. Tscharntke. 2003

353 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6fade8f5f4f1d20cc7d94f8733d0793d2612e460

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Importance of boreal grasslands in Sweden for butterfly diversity and effects of local and landscape habitat factors (2007, background): “There are studies that, in line with this study, have found no eVects of habitat isolation on butterXy species richness ( Krauss et al. 2003a ).”
Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales (2007, background): “It is likely that the relevance of the different matrix habitats in the surrounding landscape depends on the degree of specialization of the study organisms (Haila, 2002; Krauss et al., 2003).”
Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence (2010, background): “We included only papers that explicitly compared different matrix types, excluding papers that considered matrix variation only through composition indices (e.g. Krauss et al. 2003; Metzger 2000), since one aim was to evaluate the relative effects of each matrix type.”
MEASURING BEE DIVERSITY IN DIFFERENT EUROPEAN HABITATS AND BIOGEOGRAPHICAL REGIONS (2008, methodology): “For a cross-section sample, we pooled the first subunits of the respective methods, then the second subunits, and so forth (Krauss et al. 2003a, b).”
Spatial scale of observation affects α, β and γ diversity of cavity‐nesting bees and wasps across a tropical land‐use gradient (2006, background): “However, the pattern found by Klein et al. (2003) did not hold for solitary species, such as those in our study, and Krauss et al. (2003) found no effect of habitat isolation on butterfly diversity.”
Interacting effects of landscape context and habitat quality on flower visiting insects in agricultural landscapes (2006, background): “Effects of different spatial configuration or isolation of habitat patches are not straightforward and vary between studies and species groups (e.g. Krauss et al., 2003; Ricketts, Dailey, Ehrlich, & Fay, 2001; Steffan-Dewenter & Tscharntke, 1999; Thomas et al., 2001; Zschokke et al., 2000).”
BIODIVERSITY INDICATOR GROUPS OF TROPICAL LAND‐USE SYSTEMS: COMPARING PLANTS, BIRDS, AND INSECTS (2004, background): “…has a major impact on species richness (e.g., Klein 1989, Brown and Hutchings 1997, Carvalho and Vasconcelos 1999, Chiarello 2000, Laidlaw 2000, Krauss et al. 2003, Steffan-Dewenter et al. 2004), may have additionally contributed to the pronounced decrease of species richness from natural…”
Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation (2005, background): “…area (Bowers & Matter, 1997; Connor et al., 2000), although for invertebrates such a simple generalisation cannot be made because of inconsistent results in the literature (Didham et al., 1998a ; Matter, 2000; Steffan-Dewenter & Tscharntke, 2000; J. A. Thomas et al., 2001; Krauss et al., 2003a).”
Landscape structure influences pollinator movements and directly affects plant reproductive success (2012, background): “Linkages within pollination webs can be particularly susceptible to reductions in habitat patch size and increased distances between habitat fragments (Rathcke and Jules 1993, Kearns et al. 1998, Krauss et al. 2003, Steffan-Dewenter 2003, SteffanDewenter et al. 2006, Pauw 2007).”