Making sense of focus groups

By R. Barbour. Medical Education, 2005

606 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92da4e905b42b3aa5f22c2fb49f8197419a03fc3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

1. Lilla Vicsek
2. M.W. Heymans
3. R. Claes

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Lilla Vicsek
2. M.W. Heymans
3. R. Claes

Citations in the corpus

• Issues in the Analysis of Focus Groups: Generalisability, Quantifiability, Treatment of Context and Quotations (2010, background): “Focus groups can help in building theories (Barbour, 2005) or formulating analogical generalisations.”
• How does student peer review influence perceptions, engagement and academic outcomes? A case study (2014, background): “Diluting the power imbalance between researcher and participants can be beneficial in encouraging ‘relatively uninhibited discussion’ (Barbour 2005).”
• HR professionals' views on work motivation and retention of older workers: a focus group study (2008, background): “considerations ( Barbour, 2005; Cote-Arsenault & Morrison-Beedy, 2005; McLafferty,”