Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance

By Roger Guimerà, Brian Uzzi, Jarrett Spiro, Luís A. Nunes Amaral. Science, 2005

1,127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92cccbe5f3f61ffdd13b5140ce64648a7b8b5752

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Science Applications

In Sociology and Political Science

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

The science of science: from the perspective of complex systems (2017, background): “proposed a model that reveals that team assembly mechanisms determine the structure of the collaboration network and team performance [148].”
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015, background): “But, as discussed earlier, other studies suggest that membership changes and inclusion of members who are not prior acquaintances can improve the effectiveness of science teams or larger groups (Guimera et al., 2005; Pelz and Andrews, 1976; Kahn and Prager, 1994).”
Team Receptivity to Newcomers: Five Decades of Evidence and Future Research Themes (2013, methodology): “…1960), team productivity (Mathiyalakan, 2002), commercial performance (i.e. movie box-office sales, Ferriani, Cattani, & Baden-Fuller, 2009), citations of the team’s scientific output (Guimerà et al., 2005), and the execution speed of computer simulation tasks (Zoethout, Jager, & Molleman, 2010).”
The influence of relationship networks on academic performance in higher education: a comparative study between students of a creative and a non-creative discipline (2016, background): “But, as argued by recent literature, working teams internal composition may compensate the lack of relational capabilities of some of their members (Guimerà et al. 2005; Cattani and Ferriani 2008).”
The Intellectual Structure Of Research Into PPPs (2011, background): “…the benefits that scientists can gain from specializing in terms of research productivity, promotion, tenure standards and academic earnings (Guimerà et al. 2005) and the positive effects of multi-authorship on the outcome of research, suggesting that teams typically produce more…”
Bilateral Collaboration and the Emergence of Innovation Networks (2007, methodology): “In this regard, our model is in the tradition of empirical work such as Gulati (1995) and Chung et al.”
Determinants of Collaboration in European R&D Networks: Empirical Evidence from a Discrete Choice Model (2011, background): “The way how scientific teams gather for R&D collaboration— in terms of team size, fraction of newcomers and the tendency of incumbents to repeat previous collaborations—governs the resulting network structures (Guimerá et al., 2005).”
Creativity in scientific teams: : Unpacking novelty and impact (2015, background): “…value of comic books (Taylor and Greve, 2006), citation counts for patents (Fleming, 2001; Fleming et al., 2007; Singh and Fleming, 2010), journal impact factor for collaboration teams (Guimera et al., 2005), and publications and citations to measure creativity of scientists (Simonton, 1999, 2004).”