Outcomes Assessment and the Paradox of Nonprofit Accountability

By D. Campbell. 2002

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91a330d33dfeadab8bf5a80981348297585aa3ea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Chung-an Chen
2. Barry Bozeman

In Public Administration

1. Chung-an Chen
2. Barry Bozeman
3. D. Sarewitz
4. Christine L. Exley
5. Heather M. Shearer
6. Iestyn Williams

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Chung-an Chen
2. Barry Bozeman
3. Alnoor Ebrahim
4. D. Sarewitz
5. Timo Meynhardt
6. Christine L. Exley
7. Heather M. Shearer
8. Iestyn Williams

Citations in the corpus

• The Limits of Nonprofit Impact: A Contingency Framework for Measuring Social Performance (2010, background): “Those that do try to demonstrate broader societal outcomes and impacts risk overreaching by taking credit for social changes beyond their actual control (Campbell, 2002).”
• Understanding Public and Nonprofit Managers' Motivation Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory (2013, background): “and nonprofit organizations suffer from the difficulty of measuring performance (Brooks, 2002; Campbell, 2002) and, related, that these sectors have limited capacity to provide attractive compensation such as bonus pay and performance-based pay.”