Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five-factor model of personality

By Kerry Jang, W. Livesley, A. Angleitner, R. Riemann, P. Vernon. 2002

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9168e5435f979b8c8906202e7a4ff8f1980f3b3d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Cybernetic Big Five Theory. (2015, methodology): “explain the covariance among the six facets in each Big Five domain as measured by the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO PI-R; Costa & McCrae, 1992; Jang et al., 2002).”
A Cybernetic Theory of Psychopathology (2018, background): “No consensus exists regarding the number of facets within each Big Five dimension, but empirical evidence indicates that exactly two factors (labeled aspects) exist between each of the Big Five and their facets (DeYoung, Quilty, & Peterson, 2007; Jang et al., 2002).”
Critique of the five-factor model of personality (2008, unknown): “For example, it has been argued that individuals vary on each of these five trait dimensions in line with the normal curve distribution and that the factors are at least partially genetically pre-determined (Jang et al., 2002; Loehlin et al., 1998).”
The heritability of conscientiousness facets and their relationship to IQ and academic achievement (2006, result): “Heritabilities of the conscientiousness facets mostly fell within the range previously reported (e.g. Jang et al., 2002), although the heritabilities for Achievement-Striving and Order were much lower, perhaps resulting from the comparatively young age of our sample.”
Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. (2007, methodology): “…by: Y X 1 , where is the correlation matrix of the six facets, and is a matrix of the estimated genetic factor loadings for those facets reported by Jang et al. (2002).7 These genetic factor scores were computed twice for each Big Five domain, using values of derived for Jang et al.’s Canadian and…”
The Dark Triad and an expanded framework of personality (2012, methodology): “…revising, and validating personality models has relied on factor analytic approaches that do not adequately provide insight into the genetic and environmental structure of individual differences (e.g., Jang et al., 2002; Johnson & Krueger, 2004; Loehlin et al., 1998; McCrae et al., 2001).”
A behavioural genetic study of mental toughness and personality (2009, background): “Previous research has demonstrated that individual differences in all facets of the Big-5 factors of personality can be explained by genetic and nonshared environmental factors (Jang et al., 2002).”
A Genetic Basis for Social Trust? (2010, methodology): “…already been shown to have a strong genetically heritable component using the NEO-PI-R personality inventory (Hiraishi et al. 2008; Jang et al. 1998; Jang et al. 2002; Pilia et al. 2006; Shikishima et al. 2006) A reasonable objection to the conclusion that this implies equivalent origins for the…”
From madness to genius: The Openness/Intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex (2012, background): “This principle has been demonstrated in behavior genetics, where lower-level traits in the Big Five hierarchy are found to be influenced by specific genetic factors that are independent of the genetic factors influencing the entirety of each Big Five domain (Jang, McCrae, Angleitner, Riemann, & Live”
Gender Differences in Personality across the Ten Aspects of the Big Five (2011, background): “However, a large behavioral genetic study revealed that two distinct factors were necessary to account for the shared genetic variance among the facets within each domain (Jang et al., 2002).”
On personality and piloerection: Individual differences in aesthetic chills and other unusual aesthetic experiences. (2011, background): “A later study ( Jang et al., 2002) expanded this idea using behavioral genetics to indicate that two genetic factors explain the shared variance of each Big Five factor.”
The adaptive value of personality differences revealed by small island population dynamics (2007, background): “…genetic component (Benjamin et al., 1996; Bergeman et al., 1988; Bouchard et al., 1990; Cloninger, Svrakic, & Przybeck, 1993; Ebstein et al., 1996; Jang et al., 2002; Plomin, Pedersen, Lichtenstein, & McLearn, 1994; Tellegen et al., 1988), but personality differences among populations are…”
Genetic and environmental structure of adjectives describing the domains of the Big Five Model of personality: A nationwide US twin study (2004, unknown): “We note here that our study did not make use of the NEO-PI-R in operationalizing the BFM, yet our results are quite consistent with those of Jang et al. (2002), a study that was based on the NEO-PI-R.”