Information technology and the board of directors.
By R. Nolan, F. McFarlan. Harvard Business Review, 2005
512 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9149ab6cb4c7fa9a3d39709f9ae75f804b0db5a4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Haluk Demirkan
- Daniel Q. Chen
- J. Vayghan
- Paul Louis Drnevich
- David C. Croson
- Robert J. Kauffman
- Hans-Georg Fill
- D. Karagiannis
Citations in the corpus
- Information Systems Strategy: Reconceptualization, Measurement, and Implications (2010, background): “Such a perspective reflects the top management team’s (TMT) (including IS executives’) attitude toward IS that might be based on prior experience, personal preference, or industry requirements (Nolan and McFarlan 2005).”
- Information Technology and Business-Level Strategy: Toward an Integrated Theoretical Perspective (2013, background): “effectiveness gain) or to reconfigure itself to avoid the strategic jeopardy (Nolan 1995; Nolan and McFarlan 2005) caused by a rival’s unexpected action that threatens the firm’s existence.”
- Service-oriented technology and management: Perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade (2008, background): “…to formulate organizational governance in support of the service paradigm, similar to the call in the past several years for new governance approaches to the management of corporate information systems and infrastructures (Nolan and McFarlan, 2005; Nolan and McFarlan, 2005b; Weill and Ross, 2004).”