Technology, institutions, and innovation systems

By Richard R. Nelson, K. Nelson. 2002

461 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90d31273b11fb18a6c4c657e81af2c8943d41ad9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

Citations in the corpus

Differences in managerial discretion across countries: how nation‐level institutions affect the degree to which ceos matter (2011, background): “But if expectations provide guidelines, they also exert constraint (Nelson and Nelson, 2002).”
Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme (2013, background): “…n and adaptation over time between the technological, social and institutional components of an innovation, and therefore innovation cannot be understo od and managed by separating these different components (Edquist and Johnson, 1997; Ekboir, 2003; Hall and Clark, 2010; Nelson and Nelson, 2002 ).”
Four models of the creative industries (2008, unknown): “For example, Lundvall (1992), Nelson (1993, 2002), Freeman (1995), Edquist (1997).”
Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change (2007, background): “Over the last decades, institutional theories combined with evolutionary theories have led to the Innovation System (IS) approach [ 12 ].”
An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment (2010, unknown): “…of value creation, this is related to a tendency towards a growing disparity between success in the development of the understanding of physical technology on the one hand, and the adequacy of knowledge about the accompanying social technology on the other (Nelson, 2008; Nelson & Nelson, 2002).”
The determinants of financial fraud in Chinese firms: Does corporate governance as an institutional innovation matter? (2017, background): “It lies in “social technology” (proposed by Nelson and Sampat, 2001) area, and in an institutional sense it can be viewed as “the rules of the game” (North, 1990) and mechanisms constraining and shaping behaviours (Nelson, 2008; Nelson and Nelson, 2002; Williamson, 1985).”
Innovation through institutionalization: A service ecosystems perspective (2015, background): “…conceptually connects the centrality of knowledge in the technology literature (Arthur, 2009; Orlikowski, 1992), which has institutional roots, with the importance of institutions (i.e., social technologies) (Nelson & Nelson, 2002) in the formation and reformation (i.e., innovation) of markets.”