Unravelling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development programme

By C. Kilelu, L. Klerkx, C. Leeuwis. 2013

365 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6345b29ff7ecba9c518c3001c162d9297ab0650f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

In Management Information Systems

L. Klerkx

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Systems approaches to innovation in crop protection. A systematic literature review (2014, background): “The focus of such processes can be ‘optimisation-oriented’ e i.e. to optimise existing features of the system such as exchange of knowledge e or be more ‘transformation-oriented’ e i.e. to question how knowledge is produced in the first place (cf. Kilelu et al., 2013; Weber and Rohracher, 2012).”
Operationalizing inclusive innovation: lessons from innovation platforms in livestock value chains in India and Mozambique (2014, background): “…food processors, researchers, and government of ﬁ cials, who regularly come together to develop a common vision and ﬁ nd ways to achieve their goals, IPs enable and orchestrate co-evolution between technological development and social and institutional changes (Kilelu, Klerkx, and Leeuwis 2013).”
Systemic perspectives on scaling agricultural innovations. A review (2016, background): “This may require the forging of supportive partnerships (Aldrich 2011; Bhawnick 2015; Faustino and Booth 2014; GEO 2011; Klein Woolthuis 2013), such as innovation platforms , networks or labs (e.g. Kieboom 2014; Kilelu et al. 2013; Schut et al. 2015a, b; Tenywa et al. 2011; Unicef 2012).”
Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: a review (2018, background): “This point is illustrated by the experiences with dairy development in Kenya and Vietnam reported on by Kilelu et al. (2013) and Stür et al. (2013).”
RAAIS: Rapid Appraisal of Agricultural Innovation Systems (Part I). A diagnostic tool for integrated analysis of complex problems and innovation capacity (2015, background): “field, farm, region), and are shaped by interactions between stakeholders and organisations inside and outside the agricultural sector (Kilelu et al., 2013; Klerkx et al., 2010).”
Public-private partnerships as systemic agricultural innovation policy instruments – Assessing their contribution to innovation system function dynamics (2019, background): “The AIS literature emphasizes the importance of platforms and networks for upscaling and outscaling of agricultural innovations (Kilelu et al., 2013; Hermans et al., 2017).”
INNOVATION PLATFORMS: EXPERIENCES WITH THEIR INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDING IN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOR DEVELOPMENT (2015, background): “IPs can play a key role in facilitating so-called system innovation in agriculture, which has been found essential to solve the complex agricultural problems (Elzen et al., 2012a; Hounkonnou et al., 2012; Kilelu et al., 2013; Schut et al., 2015a).”
Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: A socio-cyber-physical system framework to support responsibilisation (2021, background): “Social scientists have developed the concept of socio-technical system to highlight that technology is embedded in social relations (Bijker, 1995; Hughes, 1987), and that there is a co-evolution between these domains (Kilelu et al., 2013).”
Sustainable intensification of agricultural systems in the Central African Highlands: The need for institutional innovation (2016, background): “Innovations occur across different levels, and are shaped by interactions between stakeholders and organisations inside and outside the agricultural system (Kilelu et al., 2013; Klerkx et al., 2010).”
How is innovation in aquaculture conceptualized and managed? A systematic literature review and reflection framework to inform analysis and action (2017, methodology): “Multi-stakeholder platforms used as part of an Agriculture Innovation System approach can also support multi-directional exchange of information between researchers, farmers, and other stakeholders (private sector, policymakers, and extension services) and thus contribute to closing the knowledge ex”