30. The social psychology of intergroup relations: social categorization, ingroup bias, and outgroup prejudice

By M. Brewer. 2007

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90101721122ee83750331b245b59f30fc51ab991

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A Three-Tier Hierarchy of Self-Potency: Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self (2013, background): “likely: Social graces crumble and conflict proliferates at the boundary of intergroup contact (Brewer, 2007; Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Wildschut, Pinter, Vevea, Insko, & Schopler, 2003).”
A motivational hierarchy within: primacy of the individual self, relational self, or collective self? (2012, background): “As research attests, however, social graces crumble and conflict proliferates at the boundary of intergroup contact (Brewer, 2007; Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Wildschut et al., 2003).”
Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. (2014, background): “…or via some other medium), (c) do not know others in their ingroup or the outgroup, and (d) have no vested interest in serving their group (for reviews and discussions, see Brewer, 1979, 1999, 2007; Dovidio & Gaertner, 2010; Tajfel & Turner, 1979; Turner, Hogg, Oakes, Reicher, & Wetherell, 1987).”
From Conceptualizing to Measuring HIV Stigma: A Review of HIV Stigma Mechanism Measures (2009, background): “Prejudice refers to negative emotions and feelings such as disgust, anger, and fear that HIV uninfected people feel toward HIV infected people [18, 19].”
Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice (2010, background): “…offender is a member of their ingroup, and more punitive to offenders regarded as members of a salient outgroup (Graham, Weiner, & Zucker, 1997; Kerr, Hymes, Anderson, & Weathers, 1995; Sommers & Ellsworth, 2000); this corresponds to a straightforward ingroup favouritism effect (see Brewer, 2007).”
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. (2009, background): “The psychology of ingroups has been closely related to the psychology of racism (Allport, 1954; Brewer, 2007); the psychology of authority has been studied as the psychology of fascism and blind obedience (Altemeyer, 1996; Milgram, 1974); and the psychology of purity and disgust has been related to ”