Feeling and thinking : the role of affect in social cognition

By Joseph P. Forgas. 2000

1,072 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f9b67ce69d45bed13659fe65b7f5383c68d5523

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach. (2005, neutral): “Some take the view that emotional processes cannot occur independently of cognitive processes arguing that, for example, the mere act of identifying a stimulus is a cognitive process which must occur before an emotional response can be made [44], or that cognitive evaluations of stimuli are always i”
The relationship context of human behavior and development. (2000, background): “Despite these differences, many would agree with Forgas (2000b) that moods and emotions can be differentiated: Moods... can be defined as relatively low-intensity, diffuse, and enduring affective states that have no salient antecedent cause and therefore little cognitive content (such as feeling…”
The effect of anger and anxiety traits on investment decisions (2012, background): “Previous research has found that emotional states can alter people’s goals, attitudes and perception, (e.g., Forgas, 2000; Zajonc, 2000).”
Happiness in the Face of Adversity: Reformulating the Dynamic and Modular Bases of Subjective Well-Being (2005, background): “Also, the valence of emotions, whether positive or negative, does not ensure their directive impact: There are contexts in which positive emotions designate problematic situations and negative emotions designate nonproblematic ones (Martin, 2000).”
Emotions Matter in Crisis (2011, background): “A series of researchers (e.g., Forgas, 2000; Isen, Nygren, & Ashby, 1988; Johnson & Tversky, 1983; Lener & Keltner, 2000, 2001) have investigated how emotion influences the general publics’ crisis perceptions and decision making.”
The ambivalent mind can be a wise mind: Emotional ambivalence increases judgment accuracy (2013, background): “By doing so, emotions motivate people to think and behave in ways that help them adapt to their environment and enhance their potential to survive and thrive (Forgas, 2000; Izard & Tomkins, 1966; Mowrer, 1960; Schwarz & Clore, 1988; Smith& Lazarus, 1990).”
Within-Person Fluctuations of Proactive Behavior: How Affect and Experienced Competence Regulate Work Behavior (2012, background): “…VARIABLES INFLUENCING PROACTIVE BEHAVIORS The pervasive impact of affective variables on a wide breadth of cognitive processes is well documented (Forgas, 1998, 2000), and the consequences of affective variables on organizational behavior is now extensively studied (Elfenbein, 2007; Seo,…”