Doing gender differently—The interplay of strength of gender identification and content of gender identity in predicting women's endorsement of sexist beliefs

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

When Do We Confront? Perceptions of Costs and Benefits Predict Confronting Discrimination on Behalf of the Self and Others (2012, background): “Women who are identified with their gender group and hold more progressive attitudes about women and women’s rights tend to reject sexism and participate in gender-related collective action to a greater extent than low-identified or traditionally identified women (Becker & Wagner, 2009).”
Building a Tower of Babel? Integrating Core Motivations and Features of Social Structure into the Political Psychology of Political Action (2016, background): “…which suggests that individuals see hope and scope for social change (see Cohen-Chen et al., 2014); alternatively, gender inequality may also be perceived as stable and legitimate, which would result in an acceptance and even internalization of the status quo (e.g., Becker & Wagner, 2009).”
Integrating who “we” are with what “we” (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action (2018, background): “For instance, if someone identifies strongly as a woman, this will not tell us whether this means a traditional or modern view on womanhood (Becker & Wagner, 2009).”