MetaSim—A Sequencing Simulator for Genomics and Metagenomics

By Daniel C. Richter, Felix Ott, Alexander F. Auch, R. Schmid, Daniel H. Huson. PLoS ONE, 2008

461 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background The new research field of metagenomics is providing exciting insights into various, previously unclassified ecological systems. Next-generation sequencing technologies are producing a rapid increase of environmental data in public databases. There is great need for specialized software solutions and statistical methods for dealing with complex metagenome data sets. Methodology/Principal Findings To facilitate the development and improvement of metagenomic tools and the planning of metagenomic projects, we introduce a sequencing simulator called MetaSim. Our software can be used to generate collections of synthetic reads that reflect the diverse taxonomical composition of typical metagenome data sets. Based on a database of given genomes, the program allows the user to design a metagenome by specifying the number of genomes present at different levels of the NCBI taxonomy, and then to collect reads from the metagenome using a simulation of a number of different sequencing technologies. A population sampler optionally produces evolved sequences based on source genomes and a given evolutionary tree. Conclusions/Significance MetaSim allows the user to simulate individual read datasets that can be used as standardized test scenarios for planning sequencing projects or for benchmarking metagenomic software.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8ef57b9d43092057891945209b722f5a03e01b0f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. John C. Wooley
  2. Iddo Friedberg
  3. Adam Godzik
  4. Simon Foucart
  5. Niranjan Nagarajan
  6. David Koslicki
  7. Susannah Tringe
  8. Steven W. Singer

In Molecular Biology

  1. Gail L. Rosen
  2. John C. Wooley
  3. Adam Godzik
  4. Iddo Friedberg
  5. Yuzhen Ye
  6. Katharina Jasmin Hoff
  7. Blake A. Simmons
  8. Nabil-Fareed Alikhan

Citations in the corpus