Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: a pragmatic approach

By Lucy Yardley, F. Bishop. 2007

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8eccf940bafe6a897ae014fa0aec39d46f51166d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. R. Burke Johnson
2. Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
3. C. Teddlie
4. Zehra Akyol
5. Nancy L. Leech
6. Dan Suthers
7. José F. Molina-Azorίn
8. Michael R. Harwell

Citations in the corpus

• The Person-Based Approach to Intervention Development: Application to Digital Health-Related Behavior Change Interventions (2015, background): “Using very open questions enables the researcher to capture novel responses that might not have been predicted from theory, or by the intervention developer [47].”
• Dialectical Pluralism (2017, background): “…popular and important in mixed methods research (MMR): pragmatism1 (e.g., Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011; Morgan, 2014; Teddlie & Tashakkori, 2009; Yardley & Bishop, 2008), transformativism (Mertens, 2007), dialecticalism (Greene, 2007), 1University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA Corresponding…”