Public accountability in the age of neo‐liberal governance

By S. Ranson. 2003

477 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Public Administration

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8e26843000513cb50f2eb6fd8d9895d6f3827637

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Public Administration

1. B. Lingard
2. S. Sellar
3. J. Ozga

Citations in the corpus

• ‘Catalyst data’: perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling (2013, background): “An interesting literature has also emerged on educational accountability, stretching from the critical and theoretical (e.g. Ranson 2003, 2012; Ravitch 2010; Suspitsyna 2010; Webb 2011) to the philosophical (e.g. Biesta 2004; Harvey 2010) and the more normative and policy pragmatic (e.g. Sahlberg…”
• Governing education through data in England: from regulation to self‐evaluation (2009, background): “Ranson suggests that accountability in the new context of networked, plural forms of provision has to move away from ‘a linear, hierarchical and regulatory concept of answerability’ (Ranson 2003 , 211).”