Governing education through data in England: from regulation to self‐evaluation
By J. Ozga. 2009
590 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/15cbfbb04642039151d6fe2d68bae01c3112c450
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems and Management
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- The OECD and global governance in education (2013, background): “The steering at a distance mode of governance associated with the restructured state at national level and new public management has witnessed a more significant use of data in policy processes (Ozga 2009; Lingard 2011).”
- ‘Catalyst data’: perverse systemic effects of audit and accountability in Australian schooling (2013, background): “…been a number of other phenomena, including the rise of talk about evidence-based (and evidence-informed) policy (Head 2008; Wiseman 2010), policy as numbers (Rose 1999; Ozga 2009; Lingard 2011) and new forms of state accountability, as part of what Power (1997) has called the ‘audit explosion’.”
- A feel for numbers: affect, data and education policy (2015, unknown): “Much attention has been directed to ‘governing by numbers’ (Rose, 1991) in education and the practices of measurement and comparison through which performance data are generated and used for accountability purposes (e.g. Anagnostopoulos, Rutledge, & Jacobsen, 2013; Ball, 2003; Grek, 2009; Lingard, 2”