Measurement Issues in Cross-cultural Research

By A. Church. 2010

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8de7a2a471000abc1bc640bb9f2686b5729db1a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Intentions to drop-out of youth soccer: A test of the basic needs theory among European youth from five countries (2013, methodology): “The translation-back translation procedure was based on the recommendations from mainstream and sport psychology literature (Duda & Hayashi, 1998; Harkness, 1999).”
Need Satisfaction and Well-Being (2013, background): “Metric (loading) equivalence is sufficient for comparisons of correlational relationships across cultures, whereas scalar (intercept) equivalence is preferred when scale means will be compared (Church, 2010; Steenkamp & Baumgartner, 1998).”
Self-concept consistency and short-term stability in eight cultures (2012, background): “, 2002) can confound mean comparisons across cultures (Church, 2010).”
Reliability and Validity of Japanese Versions of the Flourishing Scale and the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (2013, background): “Although the same underlying factor in different cultural settings has been found on each scale, further cross-cultural study is necessary to confirm measurement invariance across cultures (Church 2010; Steenkamp and Baumgartner 1998).”
Putting culture into context: Cultural and cross ‐cultural perspectives in career development and transition research and practice (2009, background): “The cross-cultural psychology approach has been adopted for sport psychology by Duda and Hayashi (1998) and more recently by Si and Lee (2007). All these authors direct our attention to several key points for conducting a quality cross-cultural study, such as negotiating the content of research ques”