Self-concept consistency and short-term stability in eight cultures

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Need Satisfaction and Well-Being (2013, methodology): “Based on their scores for independent and collective self-construals, the American and Australian samples can be viewed as relatively individualistic and the Filipino, Malaysian, and Chinese samples as collectivistic (Church et al., 2012).”
Perseverance Counts but Consistency Does Not! Validating the Short Grit Scale in a Collectivist Setting (2016, background): “Previous literature asserted that the Philippines is considered a collectivist context (e.g., Church et al. 2012; Datu 2014).”
Within-individual variability in self-concepts and personality states: Applying density distribution and situation-behavior approaches across cultures (2013, methodology): “Validity evidence was reported by Church, Anderson-Harumi et al. (2008) and Church et al. (2012), who found, for example, meaningful cultural differences in crossrole consistency, sensible correlates of individual differences in consistency, and expected correlations with well-being measures.”