Development of a socioemotional wealth importance (SEWi) scale for family firm research

328 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Family Firm(s) Outcomes Model: Structuring Financial and Nonfinancial Outcomes Across the Family and Firm (2017, background): “To assist researchers, Debicki et al. (2016) offers an instrument that assesses more emotional aspirations.”
Latent Profile Analysis (2017, background): “Furthermore, future studies could generate profiles based on noneconomic goals (for examples of dimensions, see Berrone et al., 2012; Debicki et al., 2016), familiness (Frank et al., 2016), or forms of family influence (Klein et al., 2005).”
The effect of socioemotional wealth on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and family business performance (2019, background): “, 2016), though showing significant problems, and another SEW measure (SEW-i) became available in 2016 (Debicki et al., 2016), but the literature has not yet embraced its empirical use.”
“SEW” What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Review of Socioemotional Wealth and a Way Forward (2020, methodology): “Our review illustrates that these three dimensions of SEW can exist independently of one another (e.g., Debicki et al., 2016) but also complement each other to explain SEW and the strategic decision making of family firms (e.g., Berrone et al., 2010; Boers et al., 2017).”