Sociometric Status and Children's Peer Experiences: Use of the Daily Diary Method

123 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Effects of Participation Rate on the Internal Reliability of Peer Nomination Measures (2013, background): “…several of these recent justifications of low participation rates are based on findings and claims within unpublished manuscripts (e.g., Angold et al., 1990, ctd. in Prinstein, 2007; Nukulkij et al., 2002, ctd. in Sandstrom & Cillessen, 2003; Terry et al., 1998, ctd. in Zakriski et al., 1999).”
Social-emotional competencies make the grade: Predicting academic success in early adolescence☆ (2014, background): “Moreover, adolescent girls have been rated by their peers as behaving in more socially and emotionally competent ways compared to boys (Sandstrom & Cillessen, 2003).”
Social causes and consequences of rejection sensitivity. (2007, background): “It should be possible to test these hypothesized similar and distinctive mechanisms using intensive longitudinal studies such as daily diary methodologies (Downey, Purdie, & Schaffer-Neitz, 1999; Sandstrom & Cillessen, 2003).”