A review of research into stakeholder perspectives on inclusion of students with autism in mainstream schools
By Jacqueline Roberts, Kate Simpson. 2016
226 citations recorded by the source corpus.
ABSTRACT Increasing numbers of students with autism are being educated in mainstream schools. However, outcomes for students with autism are poor when compared to typical students and students with other developmental disabilities. In order to better understand facilitators and barriers to success at school for students with autism, research into the attitudes of key stakeholders, educators, parents, people with autism, to inclusion in mainstream schools for students with autism, was reviewed. Key themes emerging included attitudes to inclusion, the characteristics of autism and social communication in particular and interaction with the school environment, and consequent student problem behaviour. Level of knowledge and understanding of school staff emerged as the primary issue with all stakeholders identifying the need for more training. Other support needs identified included the need for structural support, resources and funding. Parents, in particular, identified the need for a collaborative approach to the education process. The findings highlight the need to translate theory into practice to increase capacity in schools to provide effective educational programmes for students with autism.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c898a6f42f7d1fe9581527742ebc5beaace522f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Safety Research
Citations in the corpus
- An analysis of research on inclusive education: a systematic search and meta review (2018, background): “…of SEN students (Bates et al. 2015; Bossaert et al. 2013; Hughes, Banks, and Terras 2013; Koster et al. 2009; Parker et al. 2015; Qi and Ha 2012; Roberts and Simpson 2016; Watkins et al. 2015) and two reviews mention academic participation (De Vroey, Struyf, and Petry 2016; Loreman 2014).”