Networks and network resources in technological innovation systems: Towards a conceptual framework for system building

By Jörg Musiolik, Jochen Markard, Marko P. Hekkert. 2012

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c6e097a51499d3a0bf1e250b311e315061c39e8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms (2015, background): “Bergek et al., 2008b), a strategic perspective on system building (Hellsmark and Jacobsson, 2009; Musiolik and Markard, 2011; Musiolik et al., 2012), international ties within TIS (Bento and Fontes, 2015; Binz et al., 2014), and suggestions for the analysis of TIS contexts (Bergek et al., 2015;…”
Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency (2018, background): “We therefore expect system level agency that include system building (Musiolik, Markard, and Hekkert (2012), to be relatively more important in thin RISs compared to the thick and diversified ones.”
The interplay of institutions, actors and technologies in socio-technical systems — An analysis of transformations in the Australian urban water sector (2016, background): “, 2014; Weber and Rohracher, 2012), in the realm of firm strategies that purposefully foster or hinder innovation and change (Musiolik et al., 2012; Turnheim and Geels, 2013) or in the context of influencing sectoral discourses and rationales (Penna and Geels, 2012; Späth and Rohracher, 2010).”
Regional collaborations and indigenous innovation capabilities in China: A multivariate method for the analysis of regional innovation systems (2015, background): “Network activities have resulted in setting priority in research [74] and linking research fields that have high potential to aggregate into distinct technological groups [75].”
Moving innovation systems research to the next level: towards an integrative agenda (2017, unknown): “While all approaches, at least implicitly, refer to collective resources that are emerging in the specific system contexts, only the TIS scholars have started to elaborate how these could be identified and even measured in some more detail (Musiolik et al. , 2012).”
Navigators through the storm: A review of organization theories and the behavior of incumbent firms during transitions (2017, background): “For example, incumbents have been found to defensively respond to transitions by forming political coalitions (Hess, 2014) and formal networks (Musiolik et al., 2012), by strategically setting technical standards (Smink et al., 2013), managing expectations for novel technologies (Bakker et al.,…”