A Configurational Approach of the Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Growth of Family Firms

By José C. Casillas, A. Moreno, José L. Barbero. 2010

320 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c33f40605512e56c67ddd8e1c8309b447931bf7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Family Firm Heterogeneity: A Definition, Common Themes, Scholarly Progress, and Directions Forward (2021, background): “The family firm CEO’s entrepreneurial behavior drives outcomes, but such behavior tends to be more impactful when multiple or later generations are involved (Casillas et al., 2010; Kellermanns et al., 2008).”
Knowledge Internalization and Product Development in Family Firms: When Relational and Affective Factors Matter (2016, background): “Although there is significant research that supports the role of external knowledge in PD (e.g., Cassiman & Veugelers, 2006), the focus of our study is on knowledge that is internal to the family firm given the centrality of the family in entrepreneurial processes (Chirico & Salvato, 2008;…”
Roots to Grow: Family Firms and Local Embeddedness in Rural and Urban Contexts (2018, background): “conditions affecting business growth in family firms (e.g., Casillas & Moreno, 2010; Casillas et al., 2010; Eddleston et al., 2013).”
Resource orchestration in family firms: investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance (2011, background): “Specifically, this potential is based on how complementary knowledge supports differences in: (1) the awareness of cues for opportunities in the marketplace; (2) the interpretation of these cues; and (3) the response needed to exploit the opportunities (Casillas et al., 2010; Cruz and Nordqvist, for”
Family Business Growth Around the World (2020, background): “Finally, family business research has been plagued by endogeneity problems (Evert et al., 2016), particularly the firm growth literature (Casillas et al., 2010; Lee, 2006; McConaughy & Phillips, 1999; Sraer & Thesmar, 2007).”
The effect of socioemotional wealth on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and family business performance (2019, background): “Indeed, most of the empirical literature finds that firm proactiveness is a key source of sustained growth and performance for family firms (Casillas et al., 2010; Casillas & Moreno, 2010; Kallmuenzer et al., 2018; Stenholm et al., 2016).”
Entrepreneurship and Family Firm Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of An Emerging Field* (2016, background): “To be precise, specific aspects of family firm incorporated are: generational involvement (Casillas, Moreno, and Barbero 2010), family involvement (Casillas and Moreno 2010), and ownership structure (Lim, Lubatkin, and Wiseman 2010).”
Risk aversion in family firms: what do we really know? (2012, background): “Obviously, to maintain control in the family firm, the owners are also sacrificing business performance: three studies consistently found that risk aversion leads to lower sales growth of family firms (Wang and Poutziouris, 2010; Casillas et al., 2010; Memili et al., 2010).”