Ecologically unsustainable trade

By J. Andersson, Mattias Lindroth. 2001

197 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c07046b3b2e8606fd26e47e91a3364dd63d8139

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Ecologically Unequal Exchange, Ecological Debt, and Climate Justice (2009, background): “If one measures national export–import ratios in terms of physical weight, the developed world becomes a much greater net importer of environmentally intensive products (Andersson and Lindroth, 2001; FischerKowalski and Amman, 2001).”
Chain liability in multitier supply chains? Responsibility attributions for unsustainable supplier behavior (2014, background): “In this context, unsustainable supplier behavior refers to supplier behaviors that reduce ecological capital and harm the environment (Andersson and Lindroth, 2001); it differs from poor performance or supplier wrongdoing, which instead imply general deviance from basic supply chain management objec”
Ecological Unequal Exchange: Consumption, Equity, and Unsustainable Structural Relationships within the Global Economy (2007, background): “Although trade appears balanced in monetary terms, the apparent confl uence of impersonal market forces of supply and demand, there may nonetheless be an inequitable exchange of energy, productive potential, and sink-capacity demand among trading partners (Andersson and Lindroth, 2001).”
The green economy agenda: business as usual or transformational discourse? (2015, background): “…countries, there has been a stabilisation of resource throughput since the late 1980s, although this appears to have been achieved by moving production offshore, thus effectively outsourcing environmental externalities to the developing world (Andersson and Lindroth 2001, Rice 2007, Jackson 2009).”
Does income growth relocate ecological footprint (2016, background): “There are several ways of importing environmental burden of consumption in rich countries that can be understood in the context of “unequal ecological exchange” among countries (Andersson and Lindroth, 2001). One explanation is that less developed countries extract natural resources and export them ”
Who Ratifies Environmental Treaties and Why? Institutionalism, Structuralism and Participation by 192 Nations in 22 Treaties (2004, background): “See also Andersson and Lindroth 2001; and Fischer-Kowalski and Amman 2001.”
Ecological Unequal Exchange: International Trade and Uneven Utilization of Environmental Space in the World System (2007, background): “Trade between economically non-equivalent partners is arguably one mechanism shaping cross-national disparities over access to environmental space (Andersson and Lindroth 2001).”
North-South Trade and the Distribution of Environmental Goods and Burdens: a Biophysical Perspective (2004, background): “Several physical-accounting concepts and indicators, such as ecological footprints (e.g., Andersson & Lindroth, 2001) and energy-related concepts (e.g., Odum, 1984) have been applied to analyze environmentaldistribution issues related to international trade.”
Zero-Sum World (2009, background): “…useful in analyzing uneven flows of international trade, as flows of commodities can be converted into flows of ‘embodied footprints’, that is, embodied land (Andersson, forthcoming; Andersson and Lindroth, 2001; Jorgenson, 2003; Jorgenson and Rice, 2005, 2007; Nordlund, 2009; York et al., 2003).”
Does trade liberalization lead to environmental burden shifting in the global economy? (2019, background): “International trade, as facilitated by trade liberalization policy, and notably PTAs, provides the main mechanism through which national patterns of production and consumption can become disassociated, particularly with regards to concomitant environmental impacts (Andersson and Lindroth, 2001; Chew”
Ecologically Unequal Exchange, World Polity, and Biodiversity Loss (2009, background): “This ‘externalization’ occurs through the ‘vertical flow’ of agricultural products, natural resources, and manufactured goods from poor to rich nations (Anderson and Lindroth, 2001; Bunker, 1984; Ciccantell and Bunker, 1998; Evans, 1979; Frey, 2003).”